ArticleJournal of plant research2016
Quantifying the effect of crop spatial arrangement on weed suppression using functional-structural plant modelling.
Article in Journal of plant research, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed.
- Root plasticity improves maize nitrogen use when nitrogen is limiting: an analysis using 3D plant modelling.Journal of experimental botany · 2024Article
- Towards modelling emergence in plant systems.Quantitative plant biology · 2023Article
- Phenotypic and transcriptomic responses of the shade-grown species Panax ginseng to variable light conditions.Annals of botany · 2022Article
- Improving C4 photosynthesis to increase productivity under optimal and suboptimal conditions.Journal of experimental botany · 2021Article
- Turning plant interactions upside down: Light signals from below matter.Plant, cell & environment · 2021Article
- Modelling of Soybean (Plants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2020Article
- Simulating the effects of water limitation on plant biomass using a 3D functional-structural plant model of shoot and root driven by soil hydraulics.Annals of botany · 2020Article
- Ecological significance of light quality in optimizing plant defence.Plant, cell & environment · 2019Article
- Ecological interactions shape the adaptive value of plant defence: Herbivore attack versus competition for light.Functional ecology · 2019Article
- Elucidating the interaction between light competition and herbivore feeding patterns using functional-structural plant modelling.Annals of botany · 2018Article
- Subtle variation in shade avoidance responses may have profound consequences for plant competitiveness.Annals of botany · 2018Article
- Neighbor detection at the leaf tip adaptively regulates upward leaf movement through spatial auxin dynamics.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2017Article
- Spatio-temporal variations in photosynthesis.Journal of plant research · 2016Article
- Deploying Fourier Coefficients to Unravel Soybean Canopy Diversity.Frontiers in plant science · 2016Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Suppression of weed growth in a crop canopy can be enhanced by improving crop competitiveness. One way to achieve this is by modifying the crop planting pattern. In this study, we addressed the question to what extent a uniform planting pattern increases the ability of a crop to compete with weed plants for light compared to a random and a row planting pattern, and how this ability relates to crop and weed plant density as well as the relative time of emergence of the weed. To this end, we adopted the functional-structural plant modelling approach which allowed us to explicitly include the 3D spatial configuration of the crop-weed canopy and to simulate intra- and interspecific competition between individual plants for light. Based on results of simulated leaf area development, canopy photosynthesis and biomass growth of the crop, we conclude that differences between planting pattern were small, particularly if compared to the effects of relative time of emergence of the weed, weed density and crop density. Nevertheless, analysis of simulated weed biomass demonstrated that a uniform planting of the crop improved the weed-suppression ability of the crop canopy. Differences in weed suppressiveness between planting patterns were largest with weed emergence before crop emergence, when the suppressive effect of the crop was only marginal. With simultaneous emergence a uniform planting pattern was 8 and 15 % more competitive than a row and a random planting pattern, respectively. When weed emergence occurred after crop emergence, differences between crop planting patterns further decreased as crop canopy closure was reached early on regardless of planting pattern. We furthermore conclude that our modelling approach provides promising avenues to further explore crop-weed interactions and aid in the design of crop management strategies that aim at improving crop competitiveness with weeds.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.