Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27000875›Full record

ArticleJournal of plant research2016

Quantifying the effect of crop spatial arrangement on weed suppression using functional-structural plant modelling.

Jochem B Evers, Lammert Bastiaans

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of plant research, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Towards modelling emergence in plant systems.Quantitative plant biology · 2023
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Modelling of Soybean (Plants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2020
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Neighbor detection at the leaf tip adaptively regulates upward leaf movement through spatial auxin dynamics.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2017
    Article
  13. Spatio-temporal variations in photosynthesis.Journal of plant research · 2016
    Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Jochem B EversCentre for Crop Systems Analysis, Wageningen University, Droevendaalsesteeg 1, 6708, PB, Wageningen, The Netherlands. jochem.evers@wur.nl.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3956-0190
Lammert BastiaansCentre for Crop Systems Analysis, Wageningen University, Droevendaalsesteeg 1, 6708, PB, Wageningen, The Netherlands.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Suppression of weed growth in a crop canopy can be enhanced by improving crop competitiveness. One way to achieve this is by modifying the crop planting pattern. In this study, we addressed the question to what extent a uniform planting pattern increases the ability of a crop to compete with weed plants for light compared to a random and a row planting pattern, and how this ability relates to crop and weed plant density as well as the relative time of emergence of the weed. To this end, we adopted the functional-structural plant modelling approach which allowed us to explicitly include the 3D spatial configuration of the crop-weed canopy and to simulate intra- and interspecific competition between individual plants for light. Based on results of simulated leaf area development, canopy photosynthesis and biomass growth of the crop, we conclude that differences between planting pattern were small, particularly if compared to the effects of relative time of emergence of the weed, weed density and crop density. Nevertheless, analysis of simulated weed biomass demonstrated that a uniform planting of the crop improved the weed-suppression ability of the crop canopy. Differences in weed suppressiveness between planting patterns were largest with weed emergence before crop emergence, when the suppressive effect of the crop was only marginal. With simultaneous emergence a uniform planting pattern was 8 and 15 % more competitive than a row and a random planting pattern, respectively. When weed emergence occurred after crop emergence, differences between crop planting patterns further decreased as crop canopy closure was reached early on regardless of planting pattern. We furthermore conclude that our modelling approach provides promising avenues to further explore crop-weed interactions and aid in the design of crop management strategies that aim at improving crop competitiveness with weeds.

Indexed as

Models, BiologicalBiomassComputer SimulationCrops, AgriculturalPlant LeavesPlant WeedsCompetition for lightPhotosynthesisPlant–plant interactionsSink strengthVirtual plantWeed control

Identifiers

PMID27000875
PMCPMC4850179

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.