ArticleBMJ open2016
Impact of socioeconomic deprivation on screening for cardiovascular disease risk in a primary prevention population: a cross-sectional study.
Article in BMJ open, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 33 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
33 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Sex-disaggregated data in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy: a targeted literature review, meta-analysis and primary cohort study.Open heart · 2026Pooled it
- Pooled it
- Barriers and facilitators to participation in a health check for cardiometabolic diseases in primary care: A systematic review.European journal of preventive cardiology · 2018Pooled it
- Characteristics and motives of non-responders in a stepwise cardiometabolic disease prevention program in primary care.European journal of public health · 2021Trial
- Feasibility and success rates of response enhancing strategies in a stepwise prevention program for cardiometabolic diseases in primary care.BMC family practice · 2020Trial
- Step-wise approach to prevention of chronic diseases in the Danish primary care sector with the use of a personal digital health profile and targeted follow-up - an assessment of attendance.BMC public health · 2019Trial
- Data Resource Profile: Linking nationwide health and social registries in Estonia (BIG-HEART).International journal of epidemiology · 2026Article
- Rapid community "Healthy Heart" screening to identify people at high risk of cardiovascular events.PloS one · 2026Observational
- Article
- Tirzepatide and the NHS: are we creating a two-tier obesity treatment system?The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2025Article
- Challenges in the prevention, treatment and management of cardiovascular disease among older adults.The Lancet regional health. Europe · 2025Review
- The Association of Socioeconomic Status (SES) with Procedural Management and Mortality After Percutaneous Coronary Intervention (PCI): An Observational Study from the Pan-London PCI (BCIS) Registry.Journal of cardiovascular development and disease · 2025Article
- Key Determinants of Cardiovascular Outcomes in Multi-Ethnic Patients With Rheumatic Disease Using JAK Inhibitors.Musculoskeletal care · 2025Article
- Factors Influencing Women's Cancer Screening Behavior: A Case Study in South Eastern Iran.Medical journal of the Islamic Republic of Iran · 2025Article
- Article
- Patient-oriented unsupervised learning to uncover the patterns of multimorbidity associated with stroke using primary care electronic health records.BMC primary care · 2024Article
- Effect of GP visits in the compliance of preventive services: a cross-sectional study in Europe.BMC primary care · 2024Article
- Determinants of screening participation of disadvantaged populations in France: a qualitative study.Open research Europe · 2024Article
- Interventions to tackle health inequalities in cardiovascular risks for socioeconomically disadvantaged populations: a rapid review.British medical bulletin · 2023Review
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectivesInvestigate the association between socioeconomic deprivation and completeness of cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk factor recording in primary care, uptake of screening in people with incomplete risk factor recording and with actual CVD risk within the screened subgroup.
designCross-sectional study.
settingNine UK general practices.
participants7987 people aged 50-74 years with no CVD diagnosis.
methodsCVD risk was estimated using the Framingham equation from data extracted from primary care electronic health records. Where there was insufficient information to calculate risk, patients were invited to attend a screening assessment. ANALYSIS: Proportion of patients for whom clinical data were sufficiently complete to enable CVD risk to be calculated; proportion of patients invited to screening who attended; proportion of patients who attended screening whose 10-year risk of a cardiovascular event was high (>20%). For each outcome, a set of logistic regression models were run. Crude and adjusted ORs were estimated for person-level deprivation, age, gender and smoking status. We included practice-level deprivation as a continuous variable and practice as a random effect to account for clustering.
resultsPeople who had lower Indices of Multiple Deprivation (IMD) scores (less deprived) had significantly worse routine CVD risk factor recording (adjusted OR 0.97 (0.95 to 1.00) per IMD decile; p=0.042). Screening attendance was poorer in those with more deprivation (adjusted OR 0.89 (0.86 to 0.91) per IMD decile; p<0.001). Among those who attended screening, the most deprived were more likely to have CVD risk >20% (OR 1.09 (1.03 to 1.15) per IMD decile; p=0.004).
conclusionsOur data suggest that those who had the most to gain from screening were least likely to attend, potentially exacerbating existing health inequalities. Future research should focus on tailoring the delivery of CVD screening to ensure engagement of socioeconomically deprived groups.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.