Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27000335›Full record

ArticleJournal of the American Geriatrics Society2016

Health Values and Treatment Goals of Older, Multimorbid Adults Facing Life-Threatening Illness.

Aanand D Naik, Lindsey A Martin, Jennifer Moye, Michele J Karel

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the American Geriatrics Society, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 75 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
75citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
13.6field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

75 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 137 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Changes over Time in Patient Stated Values and Treatment Preferences Regarding Aggressive Therapies: Insights from the DECIDE-LVAD Trial.Medical decision making : an international journal of the Society for Medical Decision Making · 2022
    Trial
  10. Trial
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Aligning Surgical Decisions With Older Adults' Outcome Goals.Journal of the American Geriatrics Society · 2025
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

15 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Aanand D NaikCenter of Innovations in Quality, Effectiveness, and Safety, Houston Veterans Affairs Health Services Research and Development, Michael E. DeBakey Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Houston, Texas.
Lindsey A MartinCenter of Innovations in Quality, Effectiveness, and Safety, Houston Veterans Affairs Health Services Research and Development, Michael E. DeBakey Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Houston, Texas.
Jennifer MoyeVeterans Affairs Boston Healthcare System, Boston, Massachusetts.
Michele J KarelVeterans Affairs Boston Healthcare System, Boston, Massachusetts.
VA Boston Healthcare System · USHealth Services Research & Development · USThe Coordinating Center · US

Funding

Veterans? Cancer Rehabilitation StudyI01RX000104 · VA · VA BOSTON HEALTH CARE SYSTEM · PI MOYE, JENNIFER A · 2009 to 2014
–
RRD VA I01 RX000104
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesTo identify a taxonomy of health-related values that frame goals of care of older, multimorbid adults who recently faced cancer diagnosis and treatment.

designQualitative analysis of data from a longitudinal cohort study of multimorbid cancer survivors.

settingCancer registries from regional Department of Veterans Affairs networks in New England and southeast Texas.

participantsMultimorbid adults who completed interviews 12 months after diagnosis of head and neck, colorectal, gastric, or esophageal cancer and after cancer treatment (N = 146). MEASUREMENTS: An interdisciplinary team conducted thematic analyses of participants' intuitive responses to two questions: Now that you have had cancer and may face ongoing decisions about medical care in the future, what would you want your family, friends, and doctors to know about you, in terms of what is most important to you in your life? If your cancer were to recur, is there anything you'd want to be sure your loved ones knew about you and your goals of care?

resultsAnalysis revealed five distinct health-related values that guide how multimorbid cancer survivors conceptualize specific health care goals and medical decisions: self-sufficiency, life enjoyment, connectedness and legacy, balancing quality and length of life, and engagement in care. Participants typically endorsed more than one value as important.

conclusionOlder multimorbid adults who recently faced life-threatening cancer endorsed a multidimensional taxonomy of health-related values. These health-related values guide how they frame their goals for care and treatment preferences. Eliciting individuals' sense of their values during clinical encounters may improve their experiences with health care and more effectively align treatments with goals of care.

Indexed as

Advance Care PlanningTerminal CareAgedFemaleHumansLongitudinal StudiesMaleMiddle AgedNeoplasmsadvanced care planningdecision-makingmultiple morbiditiesqualitative

Identifiers

PMID27000335
PMCPMC5001155
OpenAlexW2297386285

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.