Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27000149›Full record

ArticleImplementation science : IS2016

Predictors of activity level and retention among African American lay health advisors (LHAs) from The National Witness Project: Implications for the implementation and sustainability of community-based LHA programs from a longitudinal study.

Rachel C Shelton, Sheba King Dunston, Nicole Leoce, Lina Jandorf, Hayley S Thompson, Danielle M Crookes, Deborah O Erwin

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Implementation science : IS, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Rachel C SheltonDepartment of Sociomedical Sciences, Mailman School of Public Health, Columbia University, 722 168th Street, Room 941, New York, NY, 10032, USA. rs3108@cumc.columbia.edu.
Sheba King DunstonDepartment of Sociomedical Sciences, Mailman School of Public Health, Columbia University, 722 168th Street, Room 941, New York, NY, 10032, USA.
Nicole LeoceDepartment of Biostatistics, Mailman School of Public Health, Columbia University, 722 168th Street, New York, NY, 10032, USA.
Lina JandorfDepartment of Oncological Sciences, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, 1 Gustave L. Levy Place, Box 1130, New York, NY, 10029, USA.
Hayley S ThompsonDepartment of Oncology, Karmanos Cancer Institute, Population Studies and Disparities Research Program, Wayne State University School of Medicine, 4100 John R-MM03CB, Detroit, MI, 48201, USA.
Danielle M CrookesDepartment of Epidemiology, Mailman School of Public Health, Columbia University, 722 168th Street, New York, NY, 10032, USA.
Deborah O ErwinRoswell Park Cancer Institute, Office of Cancer Health Disparities Research, Cancer Prevention & Population Sciences, Elm & Carlton Streets, Buffalo, NY, 14263, USA.

Funding

Serving as a Lay Health Advisor: The Impact on Self and CommunityR03CA150543 · NCI · ICAHN SCHOOL OF MEDICINE AT MOUNT SINAI · PI SHELTON, RACHEL C · 2010 to 2011
$161k
NCI NIH HHS 5R03CA150543-03NCI NIH HHS R03 CA150543
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundLay health advisor (LHA) programs are increasingly being implemented in the USA and globally in the context of health promotion and disease prevention. LHAs are effective in addressing health disparities when used to reach medically underserved populations, with strong evidence among African American and Hispanic women. Despite their success and the evidence supporting implementation of LHA programs in community settings, there are tremendous barriers to sustaining LHA programs and little is understood about their implementation and sustainability in "real-world" settings. The purpose of this study was to (1) propose a conceptual framework to investigate factors at individual, social, and organizational levels that impact LHA activity and retention; and (2) use prospective data to investigate the individual, social, and organizational factors that predict activity level and retention among a community-based sample of African American LHAs participating in an effective, evidence-based LHA program (National Witness Project; NWP).

methodsSeventy-six LHAs were recruited from eight NWP sites across the USA. Baseline predictor data was collected from LHAs during a telephone questionnaire administered between 2010 and 2011. Outcome data on LHA participation and program activity levels were collected in the fall of 2012 from NWP program directors. Chi-square and ANOVA tests were used to identify differences between retained and completely inactive LHAs, and LHAs with high/moderate vs. low/no activity levels. Multivariable logistic regression models were conducted to identify variables that predicted LHA retention and activity levels.

resultsIn multivariable models, LHAs based at sites with academic partnerships had increased odds of retention and high/moderate activity levels, even after adjusting for baseline LHA activity level. Higher religiosity among LHAs was associated with decreased odds of being highly/moderately active. LHA role clarity and self-efficacy were associated with retention and high/moderate activity in multivariable models unadjusted for baseline LHA activity level.

conclusionsOrganizational and role-related factors are critical in influencing the retention and activity levels of LHAs. Developing and fostering partnerships with academic institutions will be important strategies to promote successful implementation and sustainability of LHA programs. Clarifying role expectations and building self-efficacy during LHA recruitment and training should be further explored to promote LHA retention and participation.

Indexed as

Black or African AmericanCommunity Health WorkersPersonnel LoyaltyProgram EvaluationConcept FormationEvidence-Based PracticeFemaleHumansProspective StudiesSurveys and QuestionnairesUnited StatesAfrican AmericansCancer screeningEvidence-based programsImplementationLay health advisorsSustainability

Identifiers

PMID27000149
PMCPMC4802871

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.