Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27000101›Full record

ArticleQuality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation2016

A single question about a respondent's perceived financial ability to pay monthly bills explains more variance in health utility scores than absolute income and assets questions.

Janel Hanmer, Dasha Cherepanov

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Observational
  13. Development of a practical outcome measure to account for individual differences in quality-of-life appraisal: the Brief Appraisal Inventory.Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation · 2018
    Article
  14. Assessing reserve-building pursuits and person characteristics: psychometric validation of the Reserve-Building Measure.Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation · 2018
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Janel HanmerDepartment of General Internal Medicine, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, 230 McKee Place, Suite 600, Pittsburgh, PA, 15213, USA. hanmerjz@upmc.edu.
Dasha CherepanovPartnership for Health Analytic Research, LLC, Beverly Hills, CA, USA.

Funding

University of Pittsburgh Clinical and Translational Science InstitutionKL2TR000146 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI REIS, STEVEN E · 2012 to 2015
$8.7M
NCATS NIH HHS KL2 TR000146
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo evaluate a general question about ability to meet monthly bills as an alternative to direct questions about income and assets in health utility studies.

methodsWe used data from the National Health Measurement Study-a US nationally representative telephone survey collected in 2005-2006. It included health utility measures (EuroQol-5D-3L, Health Utilities Index Mark 3, Short Form-6D, and Quality of Well-being Index) and household income, assets, and financial ability to meet monthly bills questions. Each utility score was regressed on: income and assets (Model 1); difficulty paying bills (DPB) (Model 2); income, assets, and DPB (Model 3). All models used survey weights and adjusted for demographics and education.

resultsAmong 3666 respondents, as income and assets increased, DPB decreased. The DPB question had fewer missing values (n = 30) than income (n = 311) or assets (n = 373). Model 2 (DPB only) explained more variance in health utility than Model 1 (income and assets only). Including all measures (Model 3) had very modest improvement in R (2), e.g., values were 0.112 (Model 1), 0.166 (Model 2), and 0.175 (Model 3) for EuroQol-5D-3L.

conclusionsThe single question on DPB yields more information and has less missing values than the traditionally used income and assets questions.

Indexed as

Financial StatementsHealth StatusIncomeQuality of LifeSurveys and QuestionnairesAdultAgedAged, 80 and overBlack PeopleDemographyFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedWhite PeopleAssetsFinancial abilityHealth-related quality of lifeHealth utilityIncomeSocioeconomic status

Identifiers

PMID27000101
PMCPMC6497151

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.