ArticleEndocrine2016
Papillary thyroid carcinoma: different clinical behavior among pT3 tumors.
Article in Endocrine, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Characterization of the CpG island methylator phenotype subclass in papillary thyroid carcinoma.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2022Article
- Microscopic Extrathyroidal Extension Results in Increased Rate of Tumor Recurrence and Is an Independent Predictor of Patient's Outcome in Middle Eastern Papillary Thyroid Carcinoma.Frontiers in oncology · 2021Article
- Article
- Small papillary thyroid carcinoma with minimal extrathyroidal extension should be managed as ATA low-risk tumor.Journal of endocrinological investigation · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
pT3 papillary thyroid carcinoma (PTC) can be divided into three subgroups according to the largest diameter >4 cm or evidence of minimal extrathyroidal extension (ETE): A >4 cm, no ETE; B ≤4 cm, with ETE; and C >4 cm, with ETE. The aim of this study was to analyze whether these subgroups are clinically different. A retrospective analysis of clinicopathological data of patients with pT3 PTC, with a minimum follow-up of 2 years, at a referral center was conducted. Outcome was evaluated after primary treatment and after 2 and 5 years of follow-up. Patients were classified as no evidence of disease (NED), biochemical evidence of disease (BED), and structural evidence of disease (SED) either locoregional (SED-L) or at distance (SED-D). The study patients were classified into three groups as follows: Group A (n = 91), Group B (n = 101), and Group C (n = 23). Most patients were female (80.0 %); mean age at diagnosis was 49.9 ± 16.5 years. 214 patients underwent total thyroidectomy; 208 patients were treated with (131)I. Median follow-up was 6.0 years. After primary treatment, the condition of NED was significantly different between the groups (A-87.9 %, B-68.3 %, C-43.5 %; p < 0.001). Recurrence rate, either biochemical or structural, was 8.8, 7.2, and 30.0 % in groups A, B, and C, respectively. Clinical status after 2 years anticipated clinical status after 5 years, except for Group B. ETE and tumor size were found to be predictors of disease status after primary treatment and after 2 years. ETE appeared as the strongest predictor of persistence of disease after primary treatment as well as of evidence of disease, either biochemical or structural, after 2 years of follow-up.
Indexed as
Identifiers
27000081What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.