Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27000079›Full record

ArticleHealth care management science2017

Strategies for interday appointment scheduling in primary care.

Lara Wiesche, Matthias Schacht, Brigitte Werners

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Health care management science, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Lara WiescheRuhr University Bochum, Chair of Operations Research, Universitätsstraße 150, 44801, Bochum, Germany. lara.wiesche@rub.de.
Matthias SchachtRuhr University Bochum, Chair of Operations Research, Universitätsstraße 150, 44801, Bochum, Germany.
Brigitte WernersRuhr University Bochum, Chair of Operations Research, Universitätsstraße 150, 44801, Bochum, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

When faced with a medical problem, patients contact their primary care physician (PCP) first. Here mainly two types of patient requests occur: non-scheduled patients who are walk-ins without an appointment and scheduled patients with an appointment. Number and position of the scheduled appointments influence waiting times for patients, capacity for treatment and the utilization of PCPs. As the number of patient requests differs significantly between weekdays, the challenge is to match capacity with patient requests and provide as few appointment slots as necessary. In this way, capacity for walk-ins is maximized while overall capacity restrictions are met. Decisions as to the optimal appointment capacity per day on a tactical decision level has gained little attention in the literature. A mixed integer linear model is developed, where the minimum number of appointments scheduled for a weekly profile is determined. We are thus able to give the answer as to how many appointments to offer on each day in a week in order to create a schedule that takes patient preferences as well as PCP preferences into account. Appointment schedules are often influenced by uncertain demands due to the number of urgent patients, interarrivals and service times. Based on an exemplary case study, the advantages of the optimal appointment schedule on different performance criteria are shown by detailed stochastic simulations.

Indexed as

Capacity allocationDecision supportInterday appointment schedulingMathematical optimizationStochastic simulation

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.