Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26999364›Full record

ArticlePloS one2016

Whole-Genome Saliva and Blood DNA Methylation Profiling in Individuals with a Respiratory Allergy.

Sabine A S Langie, Katarzyna Szarc Vel Szic, Ken Declerck, Sophie Traen, Gudrun Koppen, Guy Van Camp, Greet Schoeters, Wim Vanden Berghe, Patrick De Boever

Erratum issuedOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 39 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
39citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
5.4field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

39 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 56 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Sabine A S LangieEnvironmental Risk and Health unit, Flemish Institute for Technological Research (VITO), Mol, Belgium.
Katarzyna Szarc Vel SzicEnvironmental Risk and Health unit, Flemish Institute for Technological Research (VITO), Mol, Belgium.
Ken DeclerckLaboratory of Protein Chemistry, Proteomics and Epigenetic Signaling (PPES), University of Antwerp, Wilrijk, Belgium.
Sophie TraenEnvironmental Risk and Health unit, Flemish Institute for Technological Research (VITO), Mol, Belgium.
Gudrun KoppenEnvironmental Risk and Health unit, Flemish Institute for Technological Research (VITO), Mol, Belgium.
Guy Van CampLaboratory of Cancer Research and Clinical Oncology, Center for Medical Genetics, University of Antwerp, Edegem, Belgium.
Greet SchoetersEnvironmental Risk and Health unit, Flemish Institute for Technological Research (VITO), Mol, Belgium.
Wim Vanden BergheLaboratory of Protein Chemistry, Proteomics and Epigenetic Signaling (PPES), University of Antwerp, Wilrijk, Belgium.
Patrick De BoeverEnvironmental Risk and Health unit, Flemish Institute for Technological Research (VITO), Mol, Belgium.
Flemish Institute for Technological Research · BEUniversity of Antwerp · BE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The etiology of respiratory allergies (RA) can be partly explained by DNA methylation changes caused by adverse environmental and lifestyle factors experienced early in life. Longitudinal, prospective studies can aid in the unravelment of the epigenetic mechanisms involved in the disease development. High compliance rates can be expected in these studies when data is collected using non-invasive and convenient procedures. Saliva is an attractive biofluid to analyze changes in DNA methylation patterns. We investigated in a pilot study the differential methylation in saliva of RA (n = 5) compared to healthy controls (n = 5) using the Illumina Methylation 450K BeadChip platform. We evaluated the results against the results obtained in mononuclear blood cells from the same individuals. Differences in methylation patterns from saliva and mononuclear blood cells were clearly distinguishable (PAdj<0.001 and |Δβ|>0.2), though the methylation status of about 96% of the cg-sites was comparable between peripheral blood mononuclear cells and saliva. When comparing RA cases with healthy controls, the number of differentially methylated sites (DMS) in saliva and blood were 485 and 437 (P<0.05 and |Δβ|>0.1), respectively, of which 216 were in common. The methylation levels of these sites were significantly correlated between blood and saliva. The absolute levels of methylation in blood and saliva were confirmed for 3 selected DMS in the PM20D1, STK32C, and FGFR2 genes using pyrosequencing analysis. The differential methylation could only be confirmed for DMS in PM20D1 and STK32C genes in saliva. We show that saliva can be used for genome-wide methylation analysis and that it is possible to identify DMS when comparing RA cases and healthy controls. The results were replicated in blood cells of the same individuals and confirmed by pyrosequencing analysis. This study provides proof-of-concept for the applicability of saliva-based whole-genome methylation analysis in the field of respiratory allergy.

Indexed as

Genome, HumanAdultCase-Control StudiesCluster AnalysisDNA MethylationGene Regulatory NetworksHumansHypersensitivityInflammationLeukocytes, MononuclearLungReproducibility of ResultsSalivaSequence Analysis, DNASignal Transduction

Identifiers

PMID26999364
PMCPMC4801358
OpenAlexW2308381528

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.