Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26999280›Full record

ArticlePloS one2016

The Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS): A Three-Factor Model of Psychopathology in Marginally Housed Persons with Substance Dependence and Psychiatric Illness.

Chantelle J Giesbrecht, Norm O'Rourke, Olga Leonova, Verena Strehlau, Karine Paquet, Fidel Vila-Rodriguez, William J Panenka, G William MacEwan, Geoffrey N Smith, Allen E Thornton and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Chantelle J GiesbrechtDepartment of Psychology, Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, British Columbia, Canada.
Norm O'RourkeDepartment of Public Health and Center for Multidisciplinary Research in Aging, Ben-Gurion University of the Negev, Be'er Sheva, Israel.
Olga LeonovaDepartment of Psychiatry, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
Verena StrehlauDepartment of Psychiatry, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
Karine PaquetDepartment of Psychiatry, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
Fidel Vila-RodriguezDepartment of Psychiatry, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
William J PanenkaDepartment of Psychiatry, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
G William MacEwanDepartment of Psychiatry, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
Geoffrey N SmithDepartment of Psychiatry, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
Allen E ThorntonDepartment of Psychology, Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, British Columbia, Canada.
William G HonerDepartment of Psychiatry, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.

Funding

Canadian Institutes of Health Research CBG-101827
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Rates of psychopathology are elevated in marginalized and unstably housed persons, underscoring the need for applicable clinical measures for these populations. The Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) is a clinical instrument principally developed for use in schizophrenia to identify the presence and severity of psychopathology symptoms. The current study investigates whether a reliable and valid PANSS factor structure emerges in a marginally housed, heterogeneous sample recruited from the Downtown Eastside of Vancouver where substance use disorders and psychiatric illness are pervasive. Participants (n = 270) underwent structured clinical assessments including the PANSS and then were randomly assigned to either exploratory (EFA) or confirmatory factor analytic (CFA) subsamples. EFA pointed to a novel three factor PANSS. This solution was supported by CFA. All retained items (28 out of 30) load significantly upon hypothesized factors and model goodness of fit analyses are in the acceptable to good range. Each of the three first-order factor constructs, labeled Psychosis/Disorganized, Negative Symptoms/Hostility, and Insight/Awareness, contributed significantly to measurement of a higher-order psychopathology construct. Further, the latent structure of this 3-factor solution appears temporally consistent over one-year. This PANSS factor structure appears valid and reliable for use in persons with multimorbidity, including substance use disorders. The structure is somewhat distinct from existing solutions likely due to the unique characteristics of this marginally housed sample.

Indexed as

HousingModels, PsychologicalPsychopathologyAdultAgedEmploymentFactor Analysis, StatisticalFemaleHumansIncomeMaleMental DisordersMiddle AgedSocial MarginalizationSubstance-Related DisordersSyndrome

Identifiers

PMID26999280
PMCPMC4801385

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.