ReviewPathogens (Basel, Switzerland)2016
The Host's Reply to Candida Biofilm.
Review in Pathogens (Basel, Switzerland), 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
20 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Activatable prodrug for controlled release of an antimicrobial peptide via the proteases overexpressed inTheranostics · 2024Article
- Article
- Battle royale: Immune response on biofilms - host-pathogen interactions.Current research in immunology · 2023Review
- Review
- Pathogenesis and Clinical Relevance ofFrontiers in microbiology · 2020Review
- Antimicrobial effect onLaser therapy · 2019Article
- Neutrophil extracellular traps in fungal infection.Seminars in cell & developmental biology · 2019Review
- Candida parapsilosis: from Genes to the Bedside.Clinical microbiology reviews · 2019Review
- Implications of the presence of yeasts in tracheobronchial secretions of critically ill intubated patients.EXCLI journal · 2019Article
- Methodologies forMicrobial cell (Graz, Austria) · 2018Review
- Gaining Insights from Candida Biofilm Heterogeneity: One Size Does Not Fit All.Journal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2018Review
- A Framework for Understanding the Evasion of Host Immunity byFrontiers in immunology · 2018Article
- Review
- Mechanisms involved in the triggering of neutrophil extracellular traps (NETs) by Candida glabrata during planktonic and biofilm growth.Scientific reports · 2017Article
- Impaired polymorphonuclear neutrophils in the oral cavity of edentulous individuals.European journal of oral sciences · 2017Article
- Conserved Inhibition of Neutrophil Extracellular Trap Release by ClinicalJournal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2017Article
- Immune Recognition of Fungal Polysaccharides.Journal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2017Review
- Fungal Biofilms: Inside Out.Microbiology spectrum · 2017Review
- The Interface between Fungal Biofilms and Innate Immunity.Frontiers in immunology · 2017Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
Abstract
Candida spp. are among the most common nosocomial fungal pathogens and are notorious for their propensity toward biofilm formation. When growing on a medical device or mucosal surface, these organisms reside as communities embedded in a protective matrix, resisting host defenses. The host responds to Candida biofilm by depositing a variety of proteins that become incorporated into the biofilm matrix. Compared to free-floating Candida, leukocytes are less effective against Candida within a biofilm. This review highlights recent advances describing the host's response to Candida biofilms using ex vivo and in vivo models of mucosal and device-associated biofilm infections.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.