ReviewPharmaceutics2016
Comprehensive Assessments of RNA-seq by the SEQC Consortium: FDA-Led Efforts Advance Precision Medicine.
Review in Pharmaceutics, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
28 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Optimal alpha reduces error rates in gene expression studies: a meta-analysis approach.BMC bioinformatics · 2017Pooled it
- GANomics: bridging legacy and modern transcriptomic platforms for clinical applications.NPJ genomic medicine · 2026Article
- RNA sequencing reveals novel lncRNA modulators in gemini nanocurcumin-treated colorectal cancer cells.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Bioinformatics frameworks for single-cell long-read sequencing: unlocking isoform-level resolution.Briefings in bioinformatics · 2025Review
- Artificial intelligence-driven circRNA vaccine development: multimodal collaborative optimization and a new paradigm for biomedical applications.Briefings in bioinformatics · 2025Article
- TAF1D promotes proliferation by transcriptionally activating G2/M phase-related genes in MYCN-amplified neuroblastoma.Cancer science · 2023Article
- Transcriptomics for Clinical and Experimental Biology Research: Hang on a Seq.Advanced genetics (Hoboken, N.J.) · 2023Review
- Transcriptomic Harmonization as the Way for Suppressing Cross-Platform Bias and Batch Effect.Biomedicines · 2022Review
- A Collaborative Initiative to Establish Genomic Biomarkers for Assessing Tumorigenic Potential to Reduce Reliance on Conventional Rodent Carcinogenicity Studies.Toxicological sciences : an official journal of the Society of Toxicology · 2022Article
- Article
- Rank-in: enabling integrative analysis across microarray and RNA-seq for cancer.Nucleic acids research · 2021Article
- Genome of the Single Human Chromosome 18 as a "Gold Standard" for Its Transcriptome.Frontiers in genetics · 2021Article
- Large scale, robust, and accurate whole transcriptome profiling from clinical formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded samples.Scientific reports · 2020Article
- The impact of different sources of heterogeneity on loss of accuracy from genomic prediction models.Biostatistics (Oxford, England) · 2020Article
- Notch3 promotes 3T3-L1 pre-adipocytes differentiation by up-regulating the expression of LARS to activate the mTOR pathway.Journal of cellular and molecular medicine · 2020Article
- The role and robustness of the Gini coefficient as an unbiased tool for the selection of Gini genes for normalising expression profiling data.Scientific reports · 2019Article
- Data sharing for clinical utility.Cold Spring Harbor molecular case studies · 2019Article
- The use of evidence from high-throughput screening and transcriptomic data in human health risk assessments.Toxicology and applied pharmacology · 2019Article
- HetEnc: a deep learning predictive model for multi-type biological dataset.BMC genomics · 2019Article
- Shambhala: a platform-agnostic data harmonizer for gene expression data.BMC bioinformatics · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Studies on gene expression in response to therapy have led to the discovery of pharmacogenomics biomarkers and advances in precision medicine. Whole transcriptome sequencing (RNA-seq) is an emerging tool for profiling gene expression and has received wide adoption in the biomedical research community. However, its value in regulatory decision making requires rigorous assessment and consensus between various stakeholders, including the research community, regulatory agencies, and industry. The FDA-led SEquencing Quality Control (SEQC) consortium has made considerable progress in this direction, and is the subject of this review. Specifically, three RNA-seq platforms (Illumina HiSeq, Life Technologies SOLiD, and Roche 454) were extensively evaluated at multiple sites to assess cross-site and cross-platform reproducibility. The results demonstrated that relative gene expression measurements were consistently comparable across labs and platforms, but not so for the measurement of absolute expression levels. As part of the quality evaluation several studies were included to evaluate the utility of RNA-seq in clinical settings and safety assessment. The neuroblastoma study profiled tumor samples from 498 pediatric neuroblastoma patients by both microarray and RNA-seq. RNA-seq offers more utilities than microarray in determining the transcriptomic characteristics of cancer. However, RNA-seq and microarray-based models were comparable in clinical endpoint prediction, even when including additional features unique to RNA-seq beyond gene expression. The toxicogenomics study compared microarray and RNA-seq profiles of the liver samples from rats exposed to 27 different chemicals representing multiple toxicity modes of action. Cross-platform concordance was dependent on chemical treatment and transcript abundance. Though both RNA-seq and microarray are suitable for developing gene expression based predictive models with comparable prediction performance, RNA-seq offers advantages over microarray in profiling genes with low expression. The rat BodyMap study provided a comprehensive rat transcriptomic body map by performing RNA-Seq on 320 samples from 11 organs in either sex of juvenile, adolescent, adult and aged Fischer 344 rats. Lastly, the transferability study demonstrated that signature genes of predictive models are reciprocally transferable between microarray and RNA-seq data for model development using a comprehensive approach with two large clinical data sets. This result suggests continued usefulness of legacy microarray data in the coming RNA-seq era. In conclusion, the SEQC project enhances our understanding of RNA-seq and provides valuable guidelines for RNA-seq based clinical application and safety evaluation to advance precision medicine.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.