Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26999054›Full record

ArticleBiometrics2016

Identifying predictive markers for personalized treatment selection.

Yuanyuan Shen, Tianxi Cai

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biometrics, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. [Subgroup identification based on the Logistic model].Nan fang yi ke da xue xue bao = Journal of Southern Medical University · 2018
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Yuanyuan ShenDepartment of Biostatistics, Harvard School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts 02115, U.S.A.
Tianxi CaiDepartment of Biostatistics, Harvard School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts 02115, U.S.A.

Funding

TrainingU54HG007963 · NHGRI · HARVARD MEDICAL SCHOOL · PI KOHANE, ISAAC S. · 2014 to 2018
$18.3M
Statistical Methods for Optimizing Personalized Treatment SelectionR01HL089778 · NHLBI · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI LU TIAN · 2008 to 2026
$4.8M
Robust Approaches to the Development and Evaluation of Prognostic ClassifiersR01GM079330 · NIGMS · HARVARD SCHOOL OF PUBLIC HEALTH · PI CAI, TIANXI · 2007 to 2014
$1.0M
NHGRI NIH HHS U54 HG007963NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL089778NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM079330
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

It is now well recognized that the effectiveness and potential risk of a treatment often vary by patient subgroups. Although trial-and-error and one-size-fits-all approaches to treatment selection remain a common practice, much recent focus has been placed on individualized treatment selection based on patient information (La Thangue and Kerr, 2011; Ong et al., 2012). Genetic and molecular markers are becoming increasingly available to guide treatment selection for various diseases including HIV and breast cancer (Mallal et al., 2008; Zujewski and Kamin, 2008). In recent years, many statistical procedures for developing individualized treatment rules (ITRs) have been proposed. However, less focus has been given to efficient selection of predictive biomarkers for treatment selection. The standard Wald test for interactions between treatment and the set of markers of interest may not work well when the marker effects are nonlinear. Furthermore, interaction-based test is scale dependent and may fail to capture markers useful for predicting individualized treatment differences. In this article, we propose to overcome these difficulties by developing a kernel machine (KM) score test that can efficiently identify markers predictive of treatment difference. Simulation studies show that our proposed KM-based score test is more powerful than the Wald test when there is nonlinear effect among the predictors and when the outcome is binary with nonlinear link functions. Furthermore, when there is high-correlation among predictors and when the number of predictors is not small, our method also over-performs Wald test. The proposed method is illustrated with two randomized clinical trials.

Indexed as

BiomarkersBiometryComputer SimulationData Interpretation, StatisticalHeart FailureHIV InfectionsHumansPrecision MedicinePrognosisRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicBiomarkersKernel machineKernel PCAPerturbationScore testTreatment selection

Identifiers

PMID26999054
PMCPMC5352461

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.