ArticleMuscle & nerve2016
Innervation of dystrophic muscle after muscle stem cell therapy.
Article in Muscle & nerve, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
- A Reduction in Selenoprotein S Amplifies the Inflammatory Profile of Fast-Twitch Skeletal Muscle in theMediators of inflammation · 2017Article
- Stem cell therapy in critical limb ischemia: Current scenario and future trends.The Indian journal of radiology & imagingArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
introductionDuchenne muscular dystrophy (DMD) is caused by loss of the structural protein, dystrophin, resulting in muscle fragility. Muscle stem cell (MuSC) transplantation is a potential therapy for DMD. It is unknown whether donor-derived muscle fibers are structurally innervated.
methodsGreen fluorescent protein (GFP)-expressing MuSCs were transplanted into the tibials anterior of adult dystrophic mdx/mTR mice. Three weeks later the neuromuscular junction was labeled by immunohistochemistry.
resultsThe percent overlap between pre- and postsynaptic immunolabeling was greater in donor-derived GFP(+) myofibers, and fewer GFP(+) myofibers were identified as denervated compared with control GFP(-) fibers (P = 0.001 and 0.03). GFP(+) fibers also demonstrated acetylcholine receptor fragmentation and expanded endplate area, indicators of muscle reinnervation (P = 0.008 and 0.033).
conclusionIt is unclear whether GFP(+) fibers are a result of de novo synthesis or fusion with damaged endogenous fibers. Either way, donor-derived fibers demonstrate clear histological innervation. Muscle Nerve 54: 763-768, 2016.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.