Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26998611›Full record

ArticlePloS one2016

Differential Item Functioning in the SF-36 Physical Functioning and Mental Health Sub-Scales: A Population-Based Investigation in the Canadian Multicentre Osteoporosis Study.

Lisa M Lix, Xiuyun Wu, Wilma Hopman, Nancy Mayo, Tolulope T Sajobi, Juxin Liu, Jerilynn C Prior, Alexandra Papaioannou, Robert G Josse, Tanveer E Towheed and 2 more

Open access · goldAbstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Challenges and lessons learned from using anchoring vignettes to explore quality of life response behavior.Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation · 2020
    Article
  5. Longitudinal assessment of health-related quality of life in osteoporosis: data from the population-based Canadian Multicentre Osteoporosis Study.Osteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA · 2019
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Interpretation and use of patient-reported outcome measures through a philosophical lens.Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation · 2019
    Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 11 institutions in 1 country.

Lisa M LixDepartment of Community Health Sciences, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, MB, Canada.
Xiuyun WuSchool of Health and Human Performance, Dalhousie University, Halifax, NS, Canada.
Wilma HopmanDepartment of Public Health Sciences, Queen's University, Kingston, ON, Canada.
Nancy MayoDivision of Clinical Epidemiology, McGill University Health Centre, Montréal, QC, Canada.
Tolulope T SajobiDepartment of Community Health Sciences & O'Brien Institute for Public Health, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada.
Juxin LiuDepartmentof Mathematics and Statistics, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, SK, Canada.
Jerilynn C PriorMedicine and Endocrinology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
Alexandra PapaioannouDepartmentof Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada.
Robert G JosseDepartmentof Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto ON, Canada.
Tanveer E TowheedDepartment of Medicine, Queen's University, Kingston, ON, Canada.
K Shawn DavisonFacultyof Graduate Studies, University of Victoria, Victoria, BC, Canada.
Richard SawatzkySchool of Nursing, Trinity Western University &Centre for Health Evaluation and Outcomes Sciences, Providence Health Care, Langley, BC, Canada.
Queen's University · CADalhousie University · CAMcGill University Health Centre · CAMcMaster University · CAUniversity of British Columbia · CAUniversity of Calgary · CAUniversity of Manitoba · CAUniversity of Saskatchewan · CAUniversity of Toronto · CAUniversity of Victoria · CAWestern University · CA

Funding

CIHR 88225-1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSelf-reported health status measures, like the Short Form 36-item Health Survey (SF-36), can provide rich information about the overall health of a population and its components, such as physical, mental, and social health. However, differential item functioning (DIF), which arises when population sub-groups with the same underlying (i.e., latent) level of health have different measured item response probabilities, may compromise the comparability of these measures. The purpose of this study was to test for DIF on the SF-36 physical functioning (PF) and mental health (MH) sub-scale items in a Canadian population-based sample.

methodsStudy data were from the prospective Canadian Multicentre Osteoporosis Study (CaMos), which collected baseline data in 1996-1997. DIF was tested using a multiple indicators multiple causes (MIMIC) method. Confirmatory factor analysis defined the latent variable measurement model for the item responses and latent variable regression with demographic and health status covariates (i.e., sex, age group, body weight, self-perceived general health) produced estimates of the magnitude of DIF effects.

resultsThe CaMos cohort consisted of 9423 respondents; 69.4% were female and 51.7% were less than 65 years. Eight of 10 items on the PF sub-scale and four of five items on the MH sub-scale exhibited DIF. Large DIF effects were observed on PF sub-scale items about vigorous and moderate activities, lifting and carrying groceries, walking one block, and bathing or dressing. On the MH sub-scale items, all DIF effects were small or moderate in size.

conclusionsSF-36 PF and MH sub-scale scores were not comparable across population sub-groups defined by demographic and health status variables due to the effects of DIF, although the magnitude of this bias was not large for most items. We recommend testing and adjusting for DIF to ensure comparability of the SF-36 in population-based investigations.

Indexed as

Mental HealthSurveys and QuestionnairesAgedCanadaDemographyFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedOsteoporosisRegression Analysis

Identifiers

PMID26998611
PMCPMC4801323
OpenAlexW2319025097

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.