Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26998518›Full record

ArticleScience advances2016

Accurate and predictive antibody repertoire profiling by molecular amplification fingerprinting.

Tarik A Khan, Simon Friedensohn, Arthur R Gorter de Vries, Jakub Straszewski, Hans-Joachim Ruscheweyh, Sai T Reddy

Open access · goldAbstract readValidation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Science advances, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 70 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
70citing papers in PubMed
18.5field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

70 citing papers in PubMed, 116 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. T Cell Thoughts.Immunological reviews · 2026
    Review
  2. Article
  3. RNA-Based High-Throughput Sequencing of the Human Immunoglobulin Repertoire.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

10 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Tarik A KhanDepartment of Biosystems Science and Engineering, ETH Zurich, 4058 Basel, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0003-2253-396X
Simon FriedensohnDepartment of Biosystems Science and Engineering, ETH Zurich, 4058 Basel, Switzerland.
Arthur R Gorter de VriesDepartment of Biosystems Science and Engineering, ETH Zurich, 4058 Basel, Switzerland.
Jakub StraszewskiDepartment of Biosystems Science and Engineering, ETH Zurich, 4058 Basel, Switzerland.; Scientific IT Services, ETH Zurich, 4058 Basel, Switzerland.
Hans-Joachim RuscheweyhDepartment of Biosystems Science and Engineering, ETH Zurich, 4058 Basel, Switzerland.; Scientific IT Services, ETH Zurich, 4058 Basel, Switzerland.; SIB Swiss Institute of Bioinformatics, 4058 Basel, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0001-7473-6086
Sai T ReddyDepartment of Biosystems Science and Engineering, ETH Zurich, 4058 Basel, Switzerland.
ETH Zurich · CHSIB Swiss Institute of Bioinformatics · CH

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

High-throughput antibody repertoire sequencing (Ig-seq) provides quantitative molecular information on humoral immunity. However, Ig-seq is compromised by biases and errors introduced during library preparation and sequencing. By using synthetic antibody spike-in genes, we determined that primer bias from multiplex polymerase chain reaction (PCR) library preparation resulted in antibody frequencies with only 42 to 62% accuracy. Additionally, Ig-seq errors resulted in antibody diversity measurements being overestimated by up to 5000-fold. To rectify this, we developed molecular amplification fingerprinting (MAF), which uses unique molecular identifier (UID) tagging before and during multiplex PCR amplification, which enabled tagging of transcripts while accounting for PCR efficiency. Combined with a bioinformatic pipeline, MAF bias correction led to measurements of antibody frequencies with up to 99% accuracy. We also used MAF to correct PCR and sequencing errors, resulting in enhanced accuracy of full-length antibody diversity measurements, achieving 98 to 100% error correction. Using murine MAF-corrected data, we established a quantitative metric of recent clonal expansion-the intraclonal diversity index-which measures the number of unique transcripts associated with an antibody clone. We used this intraclonal diversity index along with antibody frequencies and somatic hypermutation to build a logistic regression model for prediction of the immunological status of clones. The model was able to predict clonal status with high confidence but only when using MAF error and bias corrected Ig-seq data. Improved accuracy by MAF provides the potential to greatly advance Ig-seq and its utility in immunology and biotechnology.

Indexed as

AnimalsAntibodiesHigh-Throughput Screening AssaysMiceMultiplex Polymerase Chain ReactionAntibodiesbarcodeB cellbias correctionerror correctionimmunoglobulinmonoclonal antibodymultiplex-PCRnext-generation sequencingsystems immunology

Identifiers

PMID26998518
PMCPMC4795664
OpenAlexW2295956658

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.