Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26998505›Full record

ArticleMovement disorders clinical practice

Outcome measures for Parkinson's disease dementia: a systematic review.

Samantha K Holden, Wallace E Jones, Keith A Baker, Isabel M Boersma, Benzi M Kluger

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Movement disorders clinical practice. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Validation of a performance-based assessment of cognitive functional ability in Parkinson's disease.Movement disorders : official journal of the Movement Disorder Society · 2018
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Samantha K HoldenUniversity of Colorado School of Medicine, Department of Neurology, Aurora, CO.
Wallace E JonesUniversity of Colorado School of Medicine, Department of Neurology, Aurora, CO.
Keith A BakerSt. Luke's University Health Network, Department of Emergency Medicine, Bethlehem, PA.
Isabel M BoersmaUniversity of Colorado School of Medicine, Department of Neurology, Aurora, CO.
Benzi M KlugerUniversity of Colorado School of Medicine, Department of Neurology, Aurora, CO.

Funding

Colorado Clinical and Translational Sciences InstituteUL1TR001082 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO DENVER · PI SOKOL, RONALD J. · 2013 to 2017
$48.0M
Colorado Clinical and Translational Sciences InstituteKL2TR001080 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO DENVER · PI SOKOL, RONALD J. · 2013 to 2017
$2.6M
Intrinsic Cortical Networks and Cognitive Dysfunction in Parkinson???s DiseaseK02NS080885 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO DENVER · PI KLUGER, BENZI M · 2013 to 2017
$824k
Training Medical Students to Become Child PsychiatristsR25MH080859 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO DENVER · PI ROSS, RANDAL G · 2007 to 2011
$649k
Colorado Clinical and Translational Science Institute (KL2)KL2TR000156 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO DENVER · PI SOKOL, RONALD J. · 2012 to 2013
$521k
NCATS NIH HHS KL2 TR000156NCATS NIH HHS KL2 TR001080NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR001082NIMH NIH HHS R25 MH080859NINDS NIH HHS K02 NS080885
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundParkinson's disease dementia (PDD) is a major cause of morbidity and mortality in Parkinson's disease (PD), which severely affects patient functioning and quality of life and increases the risk for nursing home admission. Unfortunately, current treatment options for PDD are limited and have only marginal therapeutic effects. As novel treatments are developed, there will be a need to assess their efficacy in well-designed randomized controlled trials. However, there is no consensus on the optimal outcome measures for use in PDD clinical trials.

methodsA systematic review of PDD clinical trials and empiric studies of outcome measures used in PDD was performed. Outcome measures were divided into five categories: 1) cognitive; 2) behavioral and mood; 3) activities of daily living and quality of life; 4) global; and 5) caregiver burden.

findingsA total of 20 PDD pharmacologic clinical trials were identified. These trials incorporated a broad array of outcome measures, which were used inconsistently across trials. We summarize the psychometric properties and other relevant data on outcome measures used, including their diagnostic utility, inter-rater reliability, test-retest reliability, responsiveness, clinically meaningful change, and availability of alternate forms.

conclusionsWe have identified the best-evidenced PDD outcome measures in each domain. Further research is needed to assess the validity, reliability, and clinically meaningful change of these measures in PDD to inform the design of future clinical trials and enhance the ability of clinicians, researchers and policy-makers to interpret study results. In addition, the development of outcome measures specific to PDD may be warranted.

Indexed as

clinical trialsoutcome measuresParkinson’s disease dementia

Identifiers

PMID26998505
PMCPMC4792517

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.