Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26998334›Full record

ArticleRoyal Society open science2016

Does influenza A virus infection affect movement behaviour during stopover in its wild reservoir host?

Daniel Bengtsson, Kamran Safi, Alexis Avril, Wolfgang Fiedler, Martin Wikelski, Gunnar Gunnarsson, Johan Elmberg, Conny Tolf, Björn Olsen, Jonas Waldenström

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Royal Society open science, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
4.5field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 39 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Inference and forecast of H7N9 influenza in China, 2013 to 2015.Euro surveillance : bulletin Europeen sur les maladies transmissibles = European communicable disease bulletin · 2017
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Daniel BengtssonCentre for Ecology and Evolution in Microbial Model Systems (EEMiS) , Linnaeus University , Kalmar 391 82, Sweden.
Kamran SafiDeparment of Migration and Immuno-Ecology, Max Planck Institute for Ornithology, Am Obstberg 1, Radolfzell 78315, Germany; Department of Biology, University of Konstanz, Konstanz 78457, Germany.
Alexis AvrilCentre for Ecology and Evolution in Microbial Model Systems (EEMiS) , Linnaeus University , Kalmar 391 82, Sweden.
Wolfgang FiedlerDeparment of Migration and Immuno-Ecology, Max Planck Institute for Ornithology, Am Obstberg 1, Radolfzell 78315, Germany; Department of Biology, University of Konstanz, Konstanz 78457, Germany.
Martin WikelskiDeparment of Migration and Immuno-Ecology, Max Planck Institute for Ornithology, Am Obstberg 1, Radolfzell 78315, Germany; Department of Biology, University of Konstanz, Konstanz 78457, Germany.
Gunnar GunnarssonDivision of Natural Sciences , Kristianstad University , Kristianstad 291 88, Sweden.
Johan ElmbergDivision of Natural Sciences , Kristianstad University , Kristianstad 291 88, Sweden.
Conny TolfCentre for Ecology and Evolution in Microbial Model Systems (EEMiS) , Linnaeus University , Kalmar 391 82, Sweden.
Björn OlsenSection of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medical Sciences, Uppsala University, Uppsala 751 85, Sweden; Zoonosis Science Centre IMBIM, Uppsala University, Uppsala 751 23, Sweden.
Jonas WaldenströmCentre for Ecology and Evolution in Microbial Model Systems (EEMiS) , Linnaeus University , Kalmar 391 82, Sweden.
Linnaeus University · SEKristianstad University · SEMax Planck Institute for Ornithology · DEUniversity of Konstanz · DEUppsala University · SE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The last decade has seen a surge in research on avian influenza A viruses (IAVs), in part fuelled by the emergence, spread and potential zoonotic importance of highly pathogenic virus subtypes. The mallard (Anas platyrhynchos) is the most numerous and widespread dabbling duck in the world, and one of the most important natural hosts for studying IAV transmission dynamics. In order to predict the likelihood of IAV transmission between individual ducks and to other hosts, as well as between geographical regions, it is important to understand how IAV infection affects the host. In this study, we analysed the movements of 40 mallards equipped with GPS transmitters and three-dimensional accelerometers, of which 20 were naturally infected with low pathogenic avian influenza virus (LPAIV), at a major stopover site in the Northwest European flyway. Movements differed substantially between day and night, as well as between mallards returning to the capture site and those feeding in natural habitats. However, movement patterns did not differ between LPAIV infected and uninfected birds. Hence, LPAIV infection probably does not affect mallard movements during stopover, with high possibility of virus spread along the migration route as a consequence.

Indexed as

avian influenza A viruseffect of infectionmallardmovementstopovertransmission

Identifiers

PMID26998334
PMCPMC4785985
OpenAlexW2262950889

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.