ArticleFuture neurology2015
The future of stem cell therapy for stroke rehabilitation.
Article in Future neurology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.
- An update on stem cell therapy for stroke patients: Where are we now?Journal of cerebral blood flow and metabolism : official journal of the International Society of Cerebral Blood Flow and Metabolism · 2024Review
- Concise Review: Stem Cell Therapy for Stroke Patients: Are We There Yet?Stem cells translational medicine · 2019Review
- Factors affecting post-stroke motor recovery: Implications on neurotherapy after brain injury.Behavioural brain research · 2018Review
- Endovascular Ischemic Stroke Models in Nonhuman Primates.Neurotherapeutics : the journal of the American Society for Experimental NeuroTherapeutics · 2018Article
- Assessing the Efficacy of Cell Transplantation for Parkinson's Disease: A Patient-Centered Approach.Journal of Parkinson's disease · 2018Review
- Hypoxic conditioning and the central nervous system: A new therapeutic opportunity for brain and spinal cord injuries?Experimental biology and medicine (Maywood, N.J.) · 2017Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.
Funding
Abstract
PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.