Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26997589›Full record

ReviewAdvances in virus research2016

Functional Genomic Strategies for Elucidating Human-Virus Interactions: Will CRISPR Knockout RNAi and Haploid Cells?

Jill M Perreira, Paul Meraner, Abraham L Brass

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Advances in virus research, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
7.5field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 39 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Orthogonal genome-wide screens of bat cells identify MTHFD1 as a target of broad antiviral therapy.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2021
    Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Host-Directed Antiviral Therapy.Clinical microbiology reviews · 2020
    Review
  12. OR14I1 is a receptor for the human cytomegalovirus pentameric complex and defines viral epithelial cell tropism.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2019
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Viral journeys on the intracellular highways.Cellular and molecular life sciences : CMLS · 2018
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Jill M PerreiraDepartment of Microbiology and Physiological Systems, University of Massachusetts Medical School, Worcester, Massachusetts, USA.
Paul MeranerDepartment of Microbiology and Physiological Systems, University of Massachusetts Medical School, Worcester, Massachusetts, USA.
Abraham L BrassDepartment of Microbiology and Physiological Systems, University of Massachusetts Medical School, Worcester, Massachusetts, USA. Electronic address: abraham.brass@umassmed.edu.
University of Massachusetts Chan Medical School · US

Funding

The Role of IFITM3 in the Anti-viral Host ResponseR01AI091786 · NIAID · UNIV OF MASSACHUSETTS MED SCH WORCESTER · PI BRASS, ABRAHAM L · 2011 to 2015
$2.1M
NIAID NIH HHS 1R01AI091786NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI091786
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Over the last several years a wealth of transformative human-virus interaction discoveries have been produced using loss-of-function functional genomics. These insights have greatly expanded our understanding of how human pathogenic viruses exploit our cells to replicate. Two technologies have been at the forefront of this genetic revolution, RNA interference (RNAi) and random retroviral insertional mutagenesis using haploid cell lines (haploid cell screening), with the former technology largely predominating. Now the cutting edge gene editing of the CRISPR/Cas9 system has also been harnessed for large-scale functional genomics and is poised to possibly displace these earlier methods. Here we compare and contrast these three screening approaches for elucidating host-virus interactions, outline their key strengths and weaknesses including a comparison of an arrayed multiple orthologous RNAi reagent screen to a pooled CRISPR/Cas9 human rhinovirus 14-human cell interaction screen, and recount some notable insights made possible by each. We conclude with a brief perspective on what might lie ahead for the fast evolving field of human-virus functional genomics.

Indexed as

CRISPR-Cas SystemsHaploidyRNA InterferenceBacterial ProteinsCRISPR-Associated Protein 9EndonucleasesGene Knockout TechniquesGenetic TestingGenomicsHost-Pathogen InteractionsHumansMutagenesis, InsertionalRNA, Small InterferingVirusesBacterial ProteinsCas9 endonuclease Streptococcus pyogenesCRISPR-Associated Protein 9EndonucleasesRNA, Small InterferingCRISPR/Cas9Genetic screeningHaploid cellsHuman–virus interactionsRNA interferenceshRNAsiRNA

Identifiers

PMID26997589
PMCPMC7112329
OpenAlexW2298322071

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.