ArticleEpidemiology and psychiatric sciences2016
A social paradigm in psychiatry - themes and perspectives.
Article in Epidemiology and psychiatric sciences, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 26 citations in OpenAlex.
- A penny for your thoughts: three perspectives on financial problems and their associated factors of people with psychotic disorders.International journal of qualitative studies on health and well-being · 2025Article
- Article
- The Lost Social Context of Recovery Psychiatrization of a Social Process.Frontiers in sociology · 2022Article
- What kind of science for dual diagnosis? A pragmatic examination of the enactive approach to psychiatry.Frontiers in psychology · 2022Article
- "You have to fight to legitimize your existence all the time": The social context of depression in men with physical disabilities.Archives of psychiatric nursing · 2021Article
- Possibilities for the future of global mental health: a scenario planning approach.BMC psychiatry · 2019Article
- [Inequities in mental health: admissions for psychosis in public hospitals of the Comunitat Valenciana (2008-2015)].Revista espanola de salud publica · 2018Article
- [Where can psychiatry go from here?]Der Nervenarzt · 2018Article
- Forty years without mental hospitals in Italy.International journal of mental health systems · 2018Article
- What should we do to promote a social perspective in psychiatry?Epidemiology and psychiatric sciences · 2016Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
aimsPsychiatry as science is underpinned by paradigms. Considering whether a social paradigm may help to advance the current state of psychiatry, the review provides a reference to the rich, but fragmented past of related initiatives in the history of psychiatry and a personal view of themes, challenges and perspectives of using a social paradigm in psychiatry.
methodsMajor themes are the evidence on social determinants of mental health; the value-based importance of integrating people with mental disorders in society; options to overcome the social isolation and improve the networks of psychiatric patients; utilising a systemic approach for interventions in families and communities; and understanding group and one-to-one treatments in psychiatry primarily as social interactions. Whilst all these themes open up perspectives for future action and/or research, there are also conceptual challenges through the limitations of the current construct of mental disorders and the dominating terminology.
resultsInitiatives for using a social paradigm in psychiatry may refer to important achievements in the past, but need to go beyond this and consider on-going societal changes.
conclusionInnovation may benefit from close collaboration with social sciences and humanities.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.