Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26997183›Full record

ArticleJournal of studies on alcohol and drugs2016

Assessing the Impact of Twenty Underage Drinking Laws.

James C Fell, Michael Scherer, Sue Thomas, Robert B Voas

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of studies on alcohol and drugs, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Coordination and expertise foster legal textualism.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2022
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Consequences of alcohol and marijuana use among college students: Prevalence rates and attributions to substance-specific versus simultaneous use.Psychology of addictive behaviors : journal of the Society of Psychologists in Addictive Behaviors · 2020
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

James C FellCalverton Center, Pacific Institute for Research and Evaluation, Calverton, Maryland.
Michael SchererCalverton Center, Pacific Institute for Research and Evaluation, Calverton, Maryland.
Sue ThomasCalverton Center, Pacific Institute for Research and Evaluation, Calverton, Maryland.
Robert B VoasCalverton Center, Pacific Institute for Research and Evaluation, Calverton, Maryland.

Funding

Effects of Three Underage Drinking Laws on Youth Traffic FatalitiesR03AA022446 · NIAAA · PACIFIC INSTITUTE FOR RES AND EVALUATION · PI FELL, JAMES C. · 2013 to 2014
$152k
NIAAA NIH HHS R03 AA022446
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveOver the last two decades, many states have adopted several of the 20 laws that aim to control youth access to and possession of alcohol and prevent underage drinking in the United States. However, many of these laws have not been evaluated since their adoption. The objective of this study was to determine which minimum legal drinking age 21 (MLDA-21) laws currently have an effect on underage drinking-and-driving fatal crashes.

methodWe updated the effective dates of the 20 MLDA-21 laws examined in this study and used scores of each law's strengths and weaknesses. Our structural equation model included the 20 MLDA-21 laws, impaired driving laws, seat belt safety laws, economic strength, driving exposure, beer consumption, and fatal crash ratios of drinking-to-nondrinking drivers under age 21.

resultsNine MLDA-21 laws were associated with significant decreases in fatal crash ratios of underage drinking drivers: possession of alcohol (-7.7%), purchase of alcohol (-4.2%), use alcohol and lose your license (-7.9%), zero tolerance .02 blood alcohol concentration limit for underage drivers (-2.9%), age of bartender ≥21 (-4.1%), state responsible beverage service program (-3.8%), fake identification support provisions for retailers (-11.9%), dram shop liability (-2.5%), and social host civil liability (-1.7%). Two laws were associated with significant increases in the fatal crash ratios of underage drinking drivers: prohibition of furnishing alcohol to minors (+7.2%) and registration of beer kegs (+9.6%).

conclusionsThe nine effective MLDA-21 laws are estimated to be currently saving approximately 1,135 lives annually, yet only five states have enacted all nine laws. If all states adopted these nine effective MLDA-21 laws, it is estimated that an additional 210 lives could be saved every year.

Indexed as

Accidents, TrafficAdolescentAlcohol DrinkingAutomobile DrivingDriving Under the InfluenceFemaleHumansMaleModels, TheoreticalSafetyUnderage DrinkingUnited States

Identifiers

PMID26997183
PMCPMC4803657

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.