Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26996769›Full record

ArticleThe American journal of cardiology2016

Prognostic Utility of Calcium Scoring as an Adjunct to Stress Myocardial Perfusion Scintigraphy in End-Stage Renal Disease.

William E Moody, Erica L S Lin, Matthew Stoodley, David McNulty, Louise E Thomson, Daniel S Berman, Nicola C Edwards, Benjamin Holloway, Charles J Ferro, Jonathan N Townend and 2 more

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The American journal of cardiology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.7field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Prognostic value of myocardial perfusion imaging in patients with chronic kidney disease: A systematic review and meta-analysis.Journal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology · 2022
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Screening pre-renal transplant: Risk factors appear key but important questions remain.Journal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology · 2018
    Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

William E MoodyBirmingham Cardio-Renal Group, Department of Cardiology, Institute of Cardiovascular Sciences, Nuffield House, Queen Elizabeth Hospital Birmingham, Edgbaston. Electronic address: william.moody@nhs.net.
Erica L S LinBirmingham Cardio-Renal Group, Department of Cardiology, Institute of Cardiovascular Sciences, Nuffield House, Queen Elizabeth Hospital Birmingham, Edgbaston.
Matthew StoodleyBirmingham Cardio-Renal Group, Department of Cardiology, Institute of Cardiovascular Sciences, Nuffield House, Queen Elizabeth Hospital Birmingham, Edgbaston.
David McNultyBirmingham Cardio-Renal Group, Department of Cardiology, Institute of Cardiovascular Sciences, Nuffield House, Queen Elizabeth Hospital Birmingham, Edgbaston.
Louise E ThomsonDepartment of Cardiac Imaging and Nuclear Cardiology, S. Mark Taper Foundation Imaging Center Los Angeles, California.
Daniel S BermanDepartment of Cardiac Imaging and Nuclear Cardiology, S. Mark Taper Foundation Imaging Center Los Angeles, California.
Nicola C EdwardsBirmingham Cardio-Renal Group, Department of Cardiology, Institute of Cardiovascular Sciences, Nuffield House, Queen Elizabeth Hospital Birmingham, Edgbaston.
Benjamin HollowayBirmingham Cardio-Renal Group, Department of Cardiology, Institute of Cardiovascular Sciences, Nuffield House, Queen Elizabeth Hospital Birmingham, Edgbaston.
Charles J FerroBirmingham Cardio-Renal Group, Department of Cardiology, Institute of Cardiovascular Sciences, Nuffield House, Queen Elizabeth Hospital Birmingham, Edgbaston.
Jonathan N TownendBirmingham Cardio-Renal Group, Department of Cardiology, Institute of Cardiovascular Sciences, Nuffield House, Queen Elizabeth Hospital Birmingham, Edgbaston.
Richard P SteedsBirmingham Cardio-Renal Group, Department of Cardiology, Institute of Cardiovascular Sciences, Nuffield House, Queen Elizabeth Hospital Birmingham, Edgbaston.
Birmingham Cardio-Renal Group
Queen Elizabeth Hospital Birmingham · GBS. Mark Taper Foundation · US

Funding

British Heart Foundation FS/11/17/28700
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Coronary artery calcium score (CACS) is a strong predictor of adverse cardiovascular events in the general population. Recent data confirm the prognostic utility of single-photon emission computed tomographic (SPECT) imaging in end-stage renal disease, but whether performing CACS as part of hybrid imaging improves risk prediction in this population is unclear. Consecutive patients (n = 284) were identified after referral to a university hospital for cardiovascular risk stratification in assessment for renal transplantation. Participants underwent technetium-99m SPECT imaging after exercise or standard adenosine stress in those unable to achieve 85% maximal heart rate; multislice CACS was also performed (Siemens Symbia T16, Siemens, Erlangen, Germany). Subjects with known coronary artery disease (n = 88) and those who underwent early revascularization (n = 2) were excluded. The primary outcome was a composite of death or first myocardial infarction. An abnormal SPECT perfusion result was seen in 22% (43 of 194) of subjects, whereas 45% (87 of 194) had at least moderate CACS (>100 U). The frequency of abnormal perfusion (summed stress score ≥4) increased with increasing CACS severity (p = 0.049). There were a total of 15 events (8 deaths, and 7 myocardial infarctions) after a median duration of 18 months (maximum follow-up 3.4 years). Univariate analysis showed diabetes mellitus (Hazard ratio [HR] 3.30, 95% CI 1.14 to 9.54; p = 0.028), abnormal perfusion on SPECT (HR 5.32, 95% CI 1.84 to 15.35; p = 0.002), and moderate-to-severe CACS (HR 3.55, 95% CI 1.11 to 11.35; p = 0.032) were all associated with the primary outcome. In a multivariate model, abnormal perfusion on SPECT (HR 4.18, 95% CI 1.43 to 12.27; p = 0.009), but not moderate-to-severe CACS (HR 2.50, 95% CI 0.76 to 8.20; p = 0.130), independently predicted all-cause death or myocardial infarction. The prognostic value of CACS was not incremental to clinical and SPECT perfusion data (global chi-square change = 2.52, p = 0.112). In conclusion, a perfusion defect on SPECT is an independent predictor of adverse outcome in potential renal transplant candidates regardless of the CACS. The use of CACS as an adjunct to SPECT perfusion data does not provide incremental prognostic utility for the prediction of mortality and nonfatal myocardial infarction in end-stage renal disease.

Indexed as

Myocardial Perfusion ImagingTomography, Emission-Computed, Single-PhotonAdultAgedCoronary Artery DiseaseFemaleHumansKidney Failure, ChronicKidney TransplantationMaleMiddle AgedMultimodal ImagingMyocardial InfarctionPredictive Value of TestsPrognosisProportional Hazards Models

Identifiers

PMID26996769
PMCPMC4837228
OpenAlexW2286374035

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.