Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26996670›Full record

ReviewOncogene2016

Preclinical and clinical evaluation of MET functions in cancer cells and in the tumor stroma.

V Finisguerra, H Prenen, M Mazzone

Open access · bronzeAbstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Oncogene, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 29 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Exosomes as Drug Carriers in Anti-Cancer Therapy.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2022
    Review
  6. Smad2 inhibition ofAtherosclerosis plus · 2021
    Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. TargetingCancer discovery · 2020
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

V FinisguerraLudwig Institute for Cancer Research, Brussels, Belgium.
H PrenenDigestive Oncology, University Hospitals Leuven and Department of Oncology, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
M MazzoneLab of Molecular Oncology and Angiogenesis, Vesalius Research Center, VIB, Leuven, Belgium.
de Duve Institute · BEKU Leuven · BEVIB-KU Leuven Center for Cancer Biology · BE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A lot of attention has been dedicated to investigate the role of the tyrosine kinase receptor MET in tumors. The acquired notion that cancer cells from different histological origin strictly rely on the engagement of this specific oncogene for their growth and survival has certainly justified the development and the use of MET-targeted therapies in the clinic. However, the function and involvement of this pathway in the stroma (that often constitutes >50% of the global cellularity of the tumor) may offer the opportunity to conceive new patient stratification criteria, rational drug design and guided trials of new combination treatments. In this review, we will summarize and discuss the role of MET in cancer cells but especially in different stromal compartments, in light of the results showed by past and recent preclinical and clinical trials with anti-MET drugs.

Indexed as

AnimalsAntineoplastic AgentsClinical Trials as TopicDrug Evaluation, PreclinicalGene Expression Regulation, NeoplasticHepatocyte Growth FactorHumansNeoplasmsProtein Kinase InhibitorsProto-Oncogene Proteins c-metSignal TransductionStromal CellsTreatment OutcomeAntineoplastic AgentsHepatocyte Growth FactorProtein Kinase InhibitorsProto-Oncogene Proteins c-met

Identifiers

PMID26996670
OpenAlexW2309197047

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.