Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26996664›Full record

ArticleOncogene2017

A platform for interrogating cancer-associated p53 alleles.

A D'Brot, P Kurtz, E Regan, B Jakubowski, J M Abrams

Erratum issuedAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Oncogene, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Journal of medical genetics · 2018
    Article
  6. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

A D'BrotDepartment of Cell Biology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA.
P KurtzDepartment of Cell Biology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA.
E ReganDepartment of Physical Therapy, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA.
B JakubowskiSouthwestern Medical School, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, 5323 Harry Hines Boulevard, Dallas, TX, USA.
J M AbramsDepartment of Cell Biology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA.
The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center · US

Funding

UT Southwestern Medical Center Simmons Comprehensive Cancer CenterP30CA142543 · NCI · UT SOUTHWESTERN MEDICAL CENTER · PI Sandi Leigh Pruitt · 2010 to 2026
$53.7M
Molecular and Genetic Control of Programmed Cell DeathR01GM072124 · NIGMS · UT SOUTHWESTERN MEDICAL CENTER · PI ABRAMS, JOHN M · 2004 to 2016
$4.4M
Suppression of mobile elements by p53 genesR01GM115682 · NIGMS · UT SOUTHWESTERN MEDICAL CENTER · PI ABRAMS, JOHN M · 2015 to 2024
$2.7M
In vivo multiphoton microscope for UT Southwestern Live Cell Imaging FacilityS10RR029731 · NCRR · UT SOUTHWESTERN MEDICAL CENTER · PI LUBY-PHELPS, KATHERINE J · 2010 to 2010
$1.2M
Molecular and Genetic Control of Programmed Cell DeathR56GM072124 · NIGMS · UT SOUTHWESTERN MEDICAL CENTER · PI ABRAMS, JOHN M · 2008 to 2008
$353k
Non-canonical gene regulation through a Drosophila p53 enhancerF31GM108472 · NIGMS · UT SOUTHWESTERN MEDICAL CENTER · PI KURTZ, PAULA SCHLOSSINGER · 2013 to 2016
$120k
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA142543NCRR NIH HHS S10 RR029731NIGMS NIH HHS F31 GM108472NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM072124NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM115682NIGMS NIH HHS R56 GM072124
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

p53 is the most frequently mutated gene in human cancer. Compelling evidence argues that full transformation involves loss of growth suppression encoded by wild-type p53 together with poorly understood oncogenic activity encoded by missense mutations. Furthermore, distinguishing disease alleles from natural polymorphisms is an important clinical challenge. To interrogate the genetic activity of human p53 variants, we leveraged the Drosophila model as an in vivo platform. We engineered strains that replace the fly p53 gene with human alleles, producing a collection of stocks that are, in effect, 'humanized' for p53 variants. Like the fly counterpart, human p53 transcriptionally activated a biosensor and induced apoptosis after DNA damage. However, all humanized strains representing common alleles found in cancer patients failed to complement in these assays. Surprisingly, stimulus-dependent activation of hp53 occurred without stabilization, demonstrating that these two processes can be uncoupled. Like its fly counterpart, hp53 formed prominent nuclear foci in germline cells but cancer-associated p53 variants did not. Moreover, these same mutant alleles disrupted hp53 foci and inhibited biosensor activity, suggesting that these properties are functionally linked. Together these findings establish a functional platform for interrogating human p53 alleles and suggest that simple phenotypes could be used to stratify disease variants.

Indexed as

DNA DamageAllelesAnimalsAnimals, Genetically ModifiedApoptosisDrosophila melanogasterHumansModels, AnimalMutationNeoplasmsPhenotypeTumor Suppressor Protein p53TP53 protein, humanTumor Suppressor Protein p53

Identifiers

PMID26996664
PMCPMC5031501
OpenAlexW2306956372

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.