Trial reportInvestigational new drugs2016
Randomized phase II trial of cyclophosphamide and the oral poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitor veliparib in patients with recurrent, advanced triple-negative breast cancer.
Trial report in Investigational new drugs, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 42 papers, 8 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
42 citing papers in PubMed, 8 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 74 citations in OpenAlex.
- Targeted Treatment of Metastatic Triple-Negative Breast Cancer: A Systematic Review.The breast journal · 2024Pooled it
- Pooled it
- PARP inhibitor plus chemotherapy versus chemotherapy alone in patients with triple-negative breast cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis based on randomized controlled trials.Cancer chemotherapy and pharmacology · 2023Pooled it
- PARP (Poly ADP-Ribose Polymerase) inhibitors for locally advanced or metastatic breast cancer.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2021Pooled it
- Deep exploration of PARP inhibitors in breast cancer: monotherapy and combination therapy.The Journal of international medical research · 2021Pooled it
- Efficacy and Safety of PARP Inhibitors in Advanced or Metastatic Triple-Negative Breast Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Frontiers in oncology · 2021Pooled it
- Pooled it
- Efficacy and Safety of Poly (ADP-Ribose) Polymerase Inhibitors in Combination with Chemotherapy for Advanced Breast Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Technology in cancer research & treatmentPooled it
- Phase II trial of veliparib and temozolomide in metastatic breast cancer patients with and without BRCA1/2 mutations.Breast cancer research and treatment · 2021Trial
- Evaluation of the contribution of randomised cancer clinical trials evaluating agents without documented single-agent activity.ESMO open · 2020Trial
- Emerging Protein Targets in Triple-Negative Breast Cancer: Beyond Conventional Therapy.Cancers · 2026Review
- Mitochondrial Redox Vulnerabilities in Triple-Negative Breast Cancer: Integrative Perspectives and Emerging Therapeutic Strategies.Metabolites · 2026Review
- Homologous recombination pathway alterations in basal-like breast cancer.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Review
- Metronomic Chemotherapy in Breast Cancer: Unleashing the Potential of Combination Regimens.Cancer innovation · 2025Review
- Clinical outcomes of DNA-damaging agents and DNA damage response inhibitors combinations in cancer: a data-driven review.Frontiers in oncology · 2025Article
- DNA damage response in breast cancer and its significant role in guiding novel precise therapies.Biomarker research · 2024Review
- Small Molecule Therapeutics in the Pipeline Targeting for Triple-Negative Breast Cancer: Origin, Challenges, Opportunities, and Mechanisms of Action.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024Review
- Small molecule agents for triple negative breast cancer: Current status and future prospects.Translational oncology · 2024Review
- Cardioprotective Effects of PARP Inhibitors: A Re-Analysis of a Meta-Analysis and a Real-Word Data Analysis Using the FAERS Database.Journal of clinical medicine · 2024Article
- Combining Poly (ADP-Ribose) Polymerase (PARP) Inhibitors with Chemotherapeutic Agents: Promise and Challenges.Cancer treatment and research · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors at 8 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
Background In tumors carrying BRCA mutations, DNA damage caused by standard cytotoxic chemotherapy can be potentiated by poly [ADP-ribose] polymerase (PARP) inhibitors, leading to increased cell death through synthetic lethality. Individuals carrying mutations in BRCA have an increased incidence of triple negative breast cancer (TNBC). In order to assess the role of PARP inhibition in the treatment of TNBC, we conducted a randomized phase II trial of the combination of veliparib, a small molecule PARP inhibitor, with the cytotoxic agent cyclophosphamide versus cyclophosphamide alone in patients with refractory TNBC. Methods Adult patients with TNBC were randomized to receive oral cyclophosphamide 50 mg once daily with or without oral veliparib at 60 mg daily in 21-day cycles. Patients on the cyclophosphamide arm could crossover to the combination arm at disease progression. Results Forty-five patients were enrolled; 18 received cyclophosphamide alone and 21 received the combination as their initial treatment regimen. Lymphopenia was the most common grade 3/4 toxicity noted in both arms. One patient in the cyclophosphamide alone arm, and 2 in the combination arm had objective responses. Response rates and median progression free survival did not significantly differ between both treatment arms. Conclusion The addition of veliparib to cyclophosphamide, at the dose and schedule evaluated, did not improve the response rate over cyclophosphamide treatment alone in patients with heavily pre-treated triple-negative breast cancer.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.