Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26996336›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2016

Differential response of patient-derived primary glioblastoma cells to environmental stiffness.

Thomas James Grundy, Ellen De Leon, Kaitlyn Rose Griffin, Brett William Stringer, Bryan William Day, Ben Fabry, Justin Cooper-White, Geraldine Margaret O'Neill

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 63 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
63citing papers in PubMed
6.3field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

63 citing papers in PubMed, 93 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Mechanotherapeutic Potential of Survivin in Glioblastoma.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026
    Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Fiber alignment in 3D collagen networks as a biophysical marker for cell contractility.Matrix biology : journal of the International Society for Matrix Biology · 2023
    Article
  20. Article

3 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Thomas James GrundyChildren's Cancer Research Unit, Kids Research Institute, The Children's Hospital at Westmead, Westmead, 2145, New South Wales, Australia.
Ellen De LeonChildren's Cancer Research Unit, Kids Research Institute, The Children's Hospital at Westmead, Westmead, 2145, New South Wales, Australia.
Kaitlyn Rose GriffinChildren's Cancer Research Unit, Kids Research Institute, The Children's Hospital at Westmead, Westmead, 2145, New South Wales, Australia.
Brett William StringerBrain Cancer Research Unit &Leukaemia Foundation Research Unit, QIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute, Brisbane, 4006, Queensland, Australia.
Bryan William DayBrain Cancer Research Unit &Leukaemia Foundation Research Unit, QIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute, Brisbane, 4006, Queensland, Australia.
Ben FabryDepartment of Physics, University of Erlangen-Nuremberg, Germany.
Justin Cooper-WhiteTissue Engineering and Microfluidics Laboratory, Australian Institute for Bioengineering and Nanotechnology, University of Queensland, St. Lucia, Queensland, Australia.
Geraldine Margaret O'NeillChildren's Cancer Research Unit, Kids Research Institute, The Children's Hospital at Westmead, Westmead, 2145, New South Wales, Australia.
Children's Hospital at Westmead · AUQIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute · AUFriedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg · DEUniversity of Queensland · AUUniversity of Sydney · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The ability of cancer cells to sense external mechanical forces has emerged as a significant factor in the promotion of cancer invasion. Currently there are conflicting reports in the literature with regard to whether glioblastoma (GBM) brain cancer cell migration and invasion is rigidity-sensitive. In order to address this question we have compared the rigidity-response of primary patient-derived GBM lines. Cells were plated on polyacrylamide gels of defined rigidity that reflect the diversity of the brain tissue mechanical environment, and cell morphology and migration were analysed by time-lapse microscopy. Invasiveness was assessed in multicellular spheroids embedded in 3D matrigel cultures. Our data reveal a range of rigidity-dependent responses between the patient-derived cell lines, from reduced migration on the most compliant tissue stiffness to those that are insensitive to substrate rigidity and are equally migratory irrespective of the underlying substrate stiffness. Notably, the rigidity-insensitive GBM cells show the greatest invasive capacity in soft 3D matrigel cultures. Collectively our data confirm both rigidity-dependent and independent behaviour in primary GBM patient-derived cells.

Indexed as

Cell MovementActin CytoskeletonBrain NeoplasmsCell Line, TumorGlioblastomaHumansNeoplasm InvasivenessSpheroids, CellularSurface Properties

Identifiers

PMID26996336
PMCPMC4800394
OpenAlexW2325323186

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.