Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26996122›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of cancer2016

Predictive imaging of chemotherapeutic response in a transgenic mouse model of pancreatic cancer.

Ping Wang, Byunghee Yoo, Sarah Sherman, Pinku Mukherjee, Alana Ross, Pamela Pantazopoulos, Victoria Petkova, Christian Farrar, Zdravka Medarova, Anna Moore

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of cancer, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 24% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Tailor-Made Nanomaterials for Diagnosis and Therapy of Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2021
    Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Ping WangMolecular Imaging Laboratory, MGH/MIT/HMS Athinoula A. Martinos Center for Biomedical Imaging, Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Charlestown, MA.
Byunghee YooMolecular Imaging Laboratory, MGH/MIT/HMS Athinoula A. Martinos Center for Biomedical Imaging, Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Charlestown, MA.
Sarah ShermanMolecular Imaging Laboratory, MGH/MIT/HMS Athinoula A. Martinos Center for Biomedical Imaging, Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Charlestown, MA.
Pinku MukherjeeDepartment of Biological Sciences, University of North Carolina at Charlotte, Charlotte and School of Medicine, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC.
Alana RossMolecular Imaging Laboratory, MGH/MIT/HMS Athinoula A. Martinos Center for Biomedical Imaging, Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Charlestown, MA.
Pamela PantazopoulosMolecular Imaging Laboratory, MGH/MIT/HMS Athinoula A. Martinos Center for Biomedical Imaging, Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Charlestown, MA.
Victoria PetkovaMolecular Medicine Core, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA.
Christian FarrarMGH/MIT/HMS Athinoula A. Martinos Center for Biomedical Imaging, Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Charlestown, MA.
Zdravka MedarovaMolecular Imaging Laboratory, MGH/MIT/HMS Athinoula A. Martinos Center for Biomedical Imaging, Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Charlestown, MA.
Anna MooreMolecular Imaging Laboratory, MGH/MIT/HMS Athinoula A. Martinos Center for Biomedical Imaging, Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Charlestown, MA.
Harvard University · USMassachusetts General Hospital · USAthinoula A. Martinos Center for Biomedical Imaging · USBeth Israel Deaconess Medical Center · USUniversity of North Carolina at Chapel Hill · US

Funding

Predictive Cancer Diagnostics and Therapy ResponseR01CA135650 · NCI · MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY · PI MEDAROVA, ZDRAVKA O, MOORE, ANNA · 2008 to 2018
$4.6M
CaNCURE: Cancer Nanomedicine Co-ops For Undergraduate Research ExperiencesR25CA174650 · NCI · NORTHEASTERN UNIVERSITY · PI SRINIVAS SRIDHAR · 2014 to 2026
$3.4M
MicroRNA Therapy for Lymph Node Metastatic Breast CancerR01CA163461 · NCI · MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL · PI MEDAROVA, ZDRAVKA O · 2012 to 2016
$1.9M
IVIS Spectrum Imaging SystemS10RR025504 · NCRR · MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL · PI MOORE, ANNA · 2009 to 2009
$341k
NCI NIH HHS R01 CA135650NCI NIH HHS R01 CA163461NCI NIH HHS R25 CA174650NCRR NIH HHS S10 RR025504
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The underglycosylated mucin 1 tumor antigen (uMUC1) is a biomarker that forecasts the progression of adenocarcinomas. In this study, we evaluated the utility of a dual-modality molecular imaging approach based on targeting uMUC1 for monitoring chemotherapeutic response in a transgenic murine model of pancreatic cancer (KCM triple transgenic mice). An uMUC1-specific contrast agent (MN-EPPT) was synthesized for use with magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and fluorescence optical imaging. It consisted of dextran-coated iron oxide nanoparticles conjugated to the near infrared fluorescent dye Cy5.5 and to a uMUC1-specific peptide (EPPT). KCM triple transgenic mice were given gemcitabine as chemotherapy while control animals received saline injections following the same schedule. Changes in uMUC1 levels following chemotherapy were monitored using T2-weighted MRI and optical imaging before and 24 hr after injection of the MN-EPPT. uMUC1 expression in tumors from both groups was evaluated by histology and qRT-PCR. We observed that the average delta-T2 in the gemcitabine-treated group was significantly reduced compared to the control group indicating lower accumulation of MN-EPPT, and correspondingly, a lower level of uMUC1 expression. In vivo optical imaging confirmed the MRI findings. Fluorescence microscopy of pancreatic tumor sections showed a lower level of uMUC1 expression in the gemcitabine-treated group compared to the control, which was confirmed by qRT-PCR. Our data proved that changes in uMUC1 expression after gemcitabine chemotherapy could be evaluated using MN-EPPT-enhanced in vivo MR and optical imaging. These results suggest that the uMUC1-targeted imaging approach could provide a useful tool for the predictive assessment of therapeutic response.

Indexed as

Molecular ImagingAnimalsAntineoplastic AgentsCell Line, TumorContrast MediaDisease Models, AnimalFemaleHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleMiceMice, TransgenicMucin-1Optical ImagingPancreatic NeoplasmsReproducibility of ResultsAntineoplastic AgentsContrast MediaMucin-1in vivo imagingnanoparticlespancreatic cancerunderglycosylated mucin 1 tumor antigen (uMUC1)

Identifiers

PMID26996122
PMCPMC4925171
OpenAlexW2300705233

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.