Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26996088›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of hospital infection2016

Qualitative study of views and experiences of performance management for healthcare-associated infections.

L Brewster, C Tarrant, M Dixon-Woods

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of hospital infection, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Interventions to improve hand hygiene compliance in patient care.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2017
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Improvement capability and performance: a qualitative study of maternity services providers in the UK.International journal for quality in health care : journal of the International Society for Quality in Health Care · 2018
    Article
  12. International journal of environmental research and public health · 2018
    Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

L BrewsterDepartment of Health Sciences, University of Leicester, Leicester, UK.
C TarrantDepartment of Health Sciences, University of Leicester, Leicester, UK.
M Dixon-WoodsDepartment of Health Sciences, University of Leicester, Leicester, UK. Electronic address: md11@le.ac.uk.

Funding

Wellcome Trust 097899
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCentrally led performance management regimes using standard setting, monitoring, and incentives have become a prominent feature of infection prevention and control (IPC) in health systems.

aimTo characterize views and experiences of regulation and performance management relating to IPC in English hospitals.

methodsTwo qualitative datasets containing 139 interviews with healthcare workers and managers were analysed. Data directly relevant to performance management and IPC were extracted. Data analysis was based on the constant comparative method.

findingsParticipants reported that performance management regimes had mobilized action around specific infections. The benefits of establishing organizational structures of accountability were seen in empirical evidence of decreasing infection rates. Performance management was not, however, experienced as wholly benign, and setting targets in one area was seen to involve risks of 'tunnel vision' and the marginalization of other potentially important issues. Financial sanctions were viewed especially negatively; performance management was associated with risks of creating a culture of fearfulness, suppressing learning and disrupting inter-professional relationships.

conclusionCentrally led performance management may have some important roles in IPC, but identifying where it is appropriate and determining its limits is critical. Persisting with harsh regimes may affect relationships and increase resistance to continued improvement efforts, but leaving all improvement to local teams may also be a flawed strategy.

Indexed as

AgedAged, 80 and overClinical AuditCross InfectionDisease Transmission, InfectiousFemaleHealth Services ResearchHospitalsHumansInfection ControlInterviews as TopicMaleUnited KingdomHospital managementInfection prevention and controlPerformance managementQualitative

Identifiers

PMID26996088
PMCPMC4993094

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.