Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26995560›Full record

ArticleQuality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation2016

Perceived quality of life, 6 months after detoxification: Is abstinence a modifying factor?

John-Kåre Vederhus, Bente Birkeland, Thomas Clausen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. A mediational analysis of adverse experiences in childhood and quality of life in adulthood.International journal of methods in psychiatric research · 2022
    Article
  8. Gender Differences in Depression and Quality of Life in Current and Abstinent Ketamine Users.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. How do psychological characteristics of family members affected by substance use influence quality of life?Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation · 2019
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

John-Kåre VederhusAddiction Unit, Sørlandet Hospital HF, P.b. 416, 4604, Kristiansand, Norway. john-kare.vederhus@sshf.no.ORCID 0000-0002-7341-5480
Bente BirkelandAddiction Unit, Sørlandet Hospital HF, P.b. 416, 4604, Kristiansand, Norway.
Thomas ClausenAddiction Unit, Sørlandet Hospital HF, P.b. 416, 4604, Kristiansand, Norway.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposePatients with a substance use disorder (SUD), admitted for detoxification, often suffer from a poor quality of life (QoL). We set out to monitor QoL, together with substance use, in a departure from the usual norm of measuring substance use alone as a treatment outcome. Literature searches revealed scant knowledge of how QoL is influenced. With this in mind, we aimed to investigate whether total abstinence, prior to follow-up, could influence QoL.

methodsWe studied a prospective cohort of 140 patients admitted for inpatient detoxification treatment at Sørlandet Hospital (Norway), from September 2008 to August 2010. QoL was measured by a generic five-item questionnaire, the QoL-5. The extremes of this scale ranged from the worst possible rating of 0.1 to 0.9, as the best. A norm for the general population was benchmarked at 0.69. Change in QoL was calculated by subtracting baseline QoL from that achieved at the 6-month follow-up interview; linear regression modeling was used to study the influence of individual QoL predictors.

resultsThe mean QoL at baseline was 0.46, 39 % below that of the general reference population. By applying the clinical interpretation of the scale, we found a modest overall mean improvement in QoL at follow-up (0.11 points); the greatest increases were seen for patients with the lowest baseline QoL scores. Abstinence prior to follow-up correlated with improved QoL, while living alone and psychological distress were negative influences.

conclusionsFor patients with a SUD, clinicians should emphasize that abstinence may help to improve their QoL.

Indexed as

AdultFemaleHumansMaleMental Health ServicesNatural Family Planning MethodsProspective StudiesQuality of LifeSubstance-Related DisordersSurveys and QuestionnairesTreatment OutcomeNorwaySubstance use disordersTreatment outcome

Identifiers

PMID26995560
PMCPMC4980398

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.