Pacemaker lead Candida endocarditis: Is medical treatment possible?

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

1. Candidemia in patients with cardiovascular implantable electronic devices.Journal of interventional cardiac electrophysiology : an international journal of arrhythmias and pacing · 2021
   Article
2. Candida Endocarditis: A Review of the Pathogenesis, Morphology, Risk Factors, and Management of an Emerging and Serious Condition.Cureus · 2020
   Review
3. First Reported Case ofCase reports in cardiology · 2020
   Article
4. Medical mycology case reports · 2019
   Article
5. Candida parapsilosis: An Unusual Cause of Infective Endocarditis.Cureus · 2018
   Article
6. Prevalence of Chronic Erythematous Candidiasis in Lebanese Denture Wearers: a Clinico-microbiological Study.Materia socio-medica · 2017
   Article

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as