ArticleDatabase : the journal of biological databases and curation2016
Assessing the state of the art in biomedical relation extraction: overview of the BioCreative V chemical-disease relation (CDR) task.
Article in Database : the journal of biological databases and curation, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 85 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
85 citing papers in PubMed, 204 citations in OpenAlex.
- What Do Biomedical NER and Entity Linking Benchmarks Measure? A Corpus-Centric Diagnostic Framework.ArXiv · 2026Article
- Large language models for bioinformatics.Quantitative biology (Beijing, China) · 2026Review
- The Role of N-ary Relations in Representing Biomedical Complexity.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2026Article
- Enhancing biomedical relation extraction with directionality.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2025Article
- Enhancing biomedical relation extraction through data-centric and preprocessing-robust ensemble learning approach.Database : the journal of biological databases and curation · 2025Article
- Article
- Benchmarking large language models for biomedical natural language processing applications and recommendations.Nature communications · 2025Article
- Integrating AI-powered text mining from PubTator into the manual curation workflow at the Comparative Toxicogenomics Database.Database : the journal of biological databases and curation · 2025Article
- JTIS: enhancing biomedical document-level relation extraction through joint training with intermediate steps.Database : the journal of biological databases and curation · 2024Article
- EnzChemRED, a rich enzyme chemistry relation extraction dataset.Scientific data · 2024Article
- Integrating deep learning architectures for enhanced biomedical relation extraction: a pipeline approach.Database : the journal of biological databases and curation · 2024Article
- VAIV bio-discovery service using transformer model and retrieval augmented generation.BMC bioinformatics · 2024Article
- The biomedical relationship corpus of the BioRED track at the BioCreative VIII challenge and workshop.Database : the journal of biological databases and curation · 2024Article
- The overview of the BioRED (Biomedical Relation Extraction Dataset) track at BioCreative VIII.Database : the journal of biological databases and curation · 2024Article
- Knowledge-Infused Prompting: Assessing and Advancing Clinical Text Data Generation with Large Language Models.Findings of ACL. ACL · 2024Article
- Transformers and large language models in healthcare: A review.Artificial intelligence in medicine · 2024Review
- Towards discovery: an end-to-end system for uncovering novel biomedical relations.Database : the journal of biological databases and curation · 2024Article
- Enhancing the coverage of SemRep using a relation classification approach.Journal of biomedical informatics · 2024Article
- PubMed and beyond: biomedical literature search in the age of artificial intelligence.EBioMedicine · 2024Review
- Sequence labeling via reinforcement learning with aggregate labels.Frontiers in artificial intelligence · 2024Article
25 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
Manually curating chemicals, diseases and their relationships is significantly important to biomedical research, but it is plagued by its high cost and the rapid growth of the biomedical literature. In recent years, there has been a growing interest in developing computational approaches for automatic chemical-disease relation (CDR) extraction. Despite these attempts, the lack of a comprehensive benchmarking dataset has limited the comparison of different techniques in order to assess and advance the current state-of-the-art. To this end, we organized a challenge task through BioCreative V to automatically extract CDRs from the literature. We designed two challenge tasks: disease named entity recognition (DNER) and chemical-induced disease (CID) relation extraction. To assist system development and assessment, we created a large annotated text corpus that consisted of human annotations of chemicals, diseases and their interactions from 1500 PubMed articles. 34 teams worldwide participated in the CDR task: 16 (DNER) and 18 (CID). The best systems achieved an F-score of 86.46% for the DNER task--a result that approaches the human inter-annotator agreement (0.8875)--and an F-score of 57.03% for the CID task, the highest results ever reported for such tasks. When combining team results via machine learning, the ensemble system was able to further improve over the best team results by achieving 88.89% and 62.80% in F-score for the DNER and CID task, respectively. Additionally, another novel aspect of our evaluation is to test each participating system's ability to return real-time results: the average response time for each team's DNER and CID web service systems were 5.6 and 9.3 s, respectively. Most teams used hybrid systems for their submissions based on machining learning. Given the level of participation and results, we found our task to be successful in engaging the text-mining research community, producing a large annotated corpus and improving the results of automatic disease recognition and CDR extraction. Database URL: http://www.biocreative.org/tasks/biocreative-v/track-3-cdr/.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.