Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26994661›Full record

ArticleHearing research2016

Design, fabrication, and in vitro testing of novel three-dimensionally printed tympanic membrane grafts.

Elliott D Kozin, Nicole L Black, Jeffrey T Cheng, Max J Cotler, Michael J McKenna, Daniel J Lee, Jennifer A Lewis, John J Rosowski, Aaron K Remenschneider

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Hearing research, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 32 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
32citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
5.7field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

32 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 88 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. The cutting edge of customized surgery: 3D-printed models for patient-specific interventions in otology and auricular management-a systematic review.European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery · 2022
    Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. The Transmission of Sound to the Cochlea in Normal and Pathological Human Middle Ears.Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology : JARO · 2025
    Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Contemporary Mechanics of Conductive Hearing Loss.Operative techniques in otolaryngology--head and neck surgery · 2024
    Article
  11. Advanced 3D Visualization and 3D Printing in Radiology.Advances in experimental medicine and biology · 2023
    Article
  12. Mitigation of Hearing Damage After Repeated Blast Exposures in Animal Model of Chinchilla.Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology : JARO · 2022
    Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Mechanics of Total Drum Replacement Tympanoplasty Studied With Wideband Acoustic Immittance.Otolaryngology--head and neck surgery : official journal of American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery · 2022
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Elliott D KozinDepartment Otolaryngology, Massachusetts Eye and Ear Infirmary, Boston, MA, USA; Eaton Peabody Laboratories, Massachusetts Eye and Ear Infirmary, Boston, MA, USA; Department of Otology and Laryngology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
Nicole L BlackHarvard John A. Paulson School of Engineering and Applied Sciences, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA, USA; Wyss Institute for Biologically Inspired Engineering, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA, USA.
Jeffrey T ChengDepartment Otolaryngology, Massachusetts Eye and Ear Infirmary, Boston, MA, USA; Eaton Peabody Laboratories, Massachusetts Eye and Ear Infirmary, Boston, MA, USA; Department of Otology and Laryngology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
Max J CotlerHarvard John A. Paulson School of Engineering and Applied Sciences, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA, USA; Wyss Institute for Biologically Inspired Engineering, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA, USA.
Michael J McKennaDepartment Otolaryngology, Massachusetts Eye and Ear Infirmary, Boston, MA, USA; Eaton Peabody Laboratories, Massachusetts Eye and Ear Infirmary, Boston, MA, USA; Department of Otology and Laryngology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
Daniel J LeeDepartment Otolaryngology, Massachusetts Eye and Ear Infirmary, Boston, MA, USA; Eaton Peabody Laboratories, Massachusetts Eye and Ear Infirmary, Boston, MA, USA; Department of Otology and Laryngology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
Jennifer A LewisHarvard John A. Paulson School of Engineering and Applied Sciences, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA, USA; Wyss Institute for Biologically Inspired Engineering, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA, USA.
John J RosowskiDepartment Otolaryngology, Massachusetts Eye and Ear Infirmary, Boston, MA, USA; Eaton Peabody Laboratories, Massachusetts Eye and Ear Infirmary, Boston, MA, USA; Department of Otology and Laryngology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
Aaron K RemenschneiderDepartment Otolaryngology, Massachusetts Eye and Ear Infirmary, Boston, MA, USA; Eaton Peabody Laboratories, Massachusetts Eye and Ear Infirmary, Boston, MA, USA; Department of Otology and Laryngology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA. Electronic address: Aaron_Remenschneider@meei.harvard.edu.
Massachusetts Eye and Ear Infirmary · USHarvard University · US

Funding

Middle Ear Nonlinearity in High Intensity Sound: Impact on Hearing Damage and ProtectionR01DC016079 · NIDCD · MASSACHUSETTS EYE AND EAR INFIRMARY · PI Jeffrey Tao Cheng · 2017 to 2026
$4.1M
Computer-based Holography and Middle-Ear FunctionR01DC008642 · NIDCD · MASSACHUSETTS EYE AND EAR INFIRMARY · PI ROSOWSKI, JOHN J · 2007 to 2014
$2.2M
NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC008642NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC016079
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The tympanic membrane (TM) is an exquisite structure that captures and transmits sound from the environment to the ossicular chain of the middle ear. The creation of TM grafts by multi-material three-dimensional (3D) printing may overcome limitations of current graft materials, e.g. temporalis muscle fascia, used for surgical reconstruction of the TM. TM graft scaffolds with either 8 or 16 circumferential and radial filament arrangements were fabricated by 3D printing of polydimethylsiloxane (PDMS), flex-polyactic acid (PLA) and polycaprolactone (PCL) materials followed by uniform infilling with a fibrin-collagen composite hydrogel. Digital opto-electronic holography (DOEH) and laser Doppler vibrometry (LDV) were used to measure acoustic properties including surface motions and velocity of TM grafts in response to sound. Mechanical properties were determined using dynamic mechanical analysis (DMA). Results were compared to fresh cadaveric human TMs and cadaveric temporalis fascia. Similar to the human TM, TM grafts exhibit simple surface motion patterns at lower frequencies (400 Hz), with a limited number of displacement maxima. At higher frequencies (>1000 Hz), their displacement patterns are highly organized with multiple areas of maximal displacement separated by regions of minimal displacement. By contrast, temporalis fascia exhibited asymmetric and less regular holographic patterns. Velocity across frequency sweeps (0.2-10 kHz) measured by LDV demonstrated consistent results for 3D printed grafts, while velocity for human fascia varied greatly between specimens. TM composite grafts of different scaffold print materials and varied filament count (8 or 16) displayed minimal, but measurable differences in DOEH and LDV at tested frequencies. TM graft mechanical load increased with higher filament count and is resilient over time, which differs from temporalis fascia, which loses over 70% of its load bearing properties during mechanical testing. This study demonstrates the design, fabrication and preliminary in vitro acoustic and mechanical evaluation of 3D printed TM grafts. Data illustrate the feasibility of creating TM grafts with acoustic properties that reflect sound induced motion patterns of the human TM; furthermore, 3D printed grafts have mechanical properties that demonstrate increased resistance to deformation compared to temporalis fascia.

Indexed as

SoundTympanoplastyAcoustic StimulationBiomimeticsCadaverDimethylpolysiloxanesEar, MiddleEar OssiclesHolographyHumansMotionPolyestersPrinting, Three-DimensionalStress, MechanicalStroboscopyTissue EngineeringbaysilonDimethylpolysiloxanespolycaprolactonePolyesterspoly(lactide)3D printingBiomimeticHolographyTissue engineeringTympanic membraneTympanoplasty

Identifiers

PMID26994661
PMCPMC8056969
OpenAlexW2300267837

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.