Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26994397›Full record

Trial reportSchizophrenia bulletin2016

Four-Year Follow-up of Cognitive Behavioral Therapy in Persons at Ultra-High Risk for Developing Psychosis: The Dutch Early Detection Intervention Evaluation (EDIE-NL) Trial.

Helga K Ising, Tamar C Kraan, Judith Rietdijk, Sara Dragt, Rianne M C Klaassen, Nynke Boonstra, Dorien H Nieman, Monique Willebrands-Mendrik, David P G van den Berg, Don H Linszen and 4 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Schizophrenia bulletin, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 33 papers, 9 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
33citing papers in PubMed, 9 pooled it
7.2field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

33 citing papers in PubMed, 9 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 65 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Interventions for prodromal stage of psychosis.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2019
    Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. Pooled it
  9. Pooled it
  10. Trial
  11. Trial
  12. Trial
  13. Trial
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 7 institutions in 1 country.

Helga K IsingDepartment of Psychosis Research, Parnassia Psychiatric Institute, The Hague, The Netherlands; h.ising@parnassia.nl.
Tamar C KraanDepartment of Psychiatry, Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands;
Judith RietdijkDepartment of Psychosis Research, Parnassia Psychiatric Institute, The Hague, The Netherlands; Department of Clinical Psychology, VU University and EMGO Institute for Health and Care Research, Amsterdam, The Netherlands;
Sara DragtDepartment of Psychiatry, Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands;
Rianne M C KlaassenChild and Adolescent Department, University Medical Center, Utrecht, The Netherlands;
Nynke BoonstraDepartment of Research and Education, Friesland Mental Health Services, Leeuwarden, The Netherlands;
Dorien H NiemanDepartment of Psychiatry, Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands;
Monique Willebrands-MendrikDepartment of Psychiatry, Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands;
David P G van den BergDepartment of Psychosis Research, Parnassia Psychiatric Institute, The Hague, The Netherlands;
Don H LinszenDepartment of Psychiatry, Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands;
Lex WunderinkDepartment of Research and Education, Friesland Mental Health Services, Leeuwarden, The Netherlands;
Wim VelingDepartment of Psychiatry, University Medical Center Groningen and University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands;
Filip SmitDepartment of Clinical Psychology, VU University and EMGO Institute for Health and Care Research, Amsterdam, The Netherlands; Department of Public Mental Health, Trimbos Institute (Netherlands Institute of Mental Health and Addiction), Utrecht, The Netherlands; Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Mark van der GaagDepartment of Psychosis Research, Parnassia Psychiatric Institute, The Hague, The Netherlands; Department of Clinical Psychology, VU University and EMGO Institute for Health and Care Research, Amsterdam, The Netherlands;
Academic Medical Center · NLParnassia Groep · NLGGZ Friesland · NLAmsterdam UMC Location VUmc · NLEMGO Institute for Health and Care Research · NLUniversity Medical Center Utrecht · NLUniversity of Groningen · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPreviously, we demonstrated that cognitive behavior therapy for ultra-high risk (called CBTuhr) halved the incidence of psychosis over an 18-month period. Follow-up data from the same study are used to evaluate the longer-term effects at 4 years post-baseline.

methodThe Dutch Early Detection and Intervention Evaluation study was a randomized controlled trial of 196 UHR patients comparing CBTuhr with treatment-as-usual (TAU) for comorbid disorders with TAU only. Of the original 196 patients, 113 consented to a 4-year follow-up (57.7%; CBTuhr = 56 vs TAU = 57). Over the study period, psychosis incidence, remission from UHR status, and the effects of transition to psychosis were evaluated.

resultsThe number of participants in the CBTuhr group making the transition to psychosis increased from 10 at 18-month follow-up to 12 at 4-year follow-up whereas it did not change in the TAU group (n = 22); this still represents a clinically important (incidence rate ratio [IRR] = 12/22 = 0.55) and significant effect (F(1,5) = 8.09, P = .03), favoring CBTuhr. The odds ratio of CBTuhr compared to TAU was 0.44 (95% CI: 0.24-0.82) and the number needed to treat was 8. Moreover, significantly more patients remitted from their UHR status in the CBTuhr group (76.3%) compared with the TAU group (58.7%) [t(120) = 2.08, P = .04]. Importantly, transition to psychosis was associated with more severe psychopathology and social functioning at 4-year follow-up.

conclusionsCBTuhr to prevent a first episode of psychosis in persons at UHR of developing psychosis is still effective at 4-year follow-up. Our data also show that individuals meeting the formal criteria of a psychotic disorder have worse functional and social outcomes compared with non-transitioned cases.

trial registrationThe trial is registered at Current Controlled Trials as trial number ISRCTN21353122 (http://controlled-trials.com/ISRCTN21353122/gaag).

Indexed as

Disease ProgressionOutcome Assessment, Health CareAdultCognitive Behavioral TherapyEarly DiagnosisEarly Medical InterventionFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansMaleNetherlandsPsychotic DisordersRiskYoung Adultat-risk mental statecognitive behavior therapypreventionschizophreniaultra-high risk

Identifiers

PMID26994397
PMCPMC4988735
OpenAlexW2298476973

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.