Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26994058›Full record

ArticleJournal of pediatric psychology2016

Initial Validation of the Sleep Disturbances in Pediatric Cancer Model.

Lauren C Daniel, Lisa A Schwartz, Jodi A Mindell, Carole A Tucker, Lamia P Barakat

Open access · bronzeAbstract readValidation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of pediatric psychology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
6.5field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 32 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Updating our understanding of health-related quality of life issues in children with cancer: a systematic review of patient-reported outcome measures and qualitative studies.Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation · 2023
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. A Primer on Mixed Methods for Pediatric Researchers.Journal of pediatric psychology · 2019
    Article
  11. Article
  12. The relationship between child and caregiver sleep in acute lymphoblastic leukemia maintenance.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2018
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Symptoms in Children Receiving Treatment for Cancer-Part I: Fatigue, Sleep Disturbance, and Nausea/Vomiting.Journal of pediatric oncology nursing : official journal of the Association of Pediatric Oncology Nurses
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Lauren C DanielDivision of Oncology, The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, daniell@email.chop.edu.
Lisa A SchwartzDivision of Oncology, The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Department of Pediatrics, Perelman School of Medicine of the University of Pennsylvania.
Jodi A MindellDepartment of Pediatrics, Perelman School of Medicine of the University of Pennsylvania, Division of Pulmonary Medicine, The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Department of Psychology, Saint Joseph's University, and.
Carole A TuckerCollege of Public Health, Departments of Physical Therapy and Electrical and Computer Engineering, Temple University.
Lamia P BarakatDivision of Oncology, The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Department of Pediatrics, Perelman School of Medicine of the University of Pennsylvania.
Children's Hospital of Philadelphia · USPublic Health Department · INUniversity of Pennsylvania · US

Funding

NHLBI NIH HHS L40 HL115784
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThe current study evaluates content validity of the Sleep Disturbance in Pediatric Cancer (SDPC) model using qualitative and quantitative stakeholder input. 

methodsParents of children (aged: 3-12 years) with acute lymphoblastic leukemia (n = 20) and medical providers (n = 6) participated in semi-structured interviews about child sleep during cancer treatment. They also rated SDPC model component importance on a 0-4 scale and selected the most relevant sleep-related intervention targets. 

resultsQualitatively, parents and providers endorsed that changes in the child's psychosocial, environmental, and biological processes affect sleep. Stakeholders rated most model components (parent: 32 of 40; provider: 39 of 41) as important (>2) to child sleep. Parents were most interested in interventions targeting difficulty falling asleep and providers selected irregular sleep habits/scheduling, though groups did not differ significantly.

conclusionsStakeholders supported SDPC content validity. The model will inform subsequent measure and intervention development focusing on biological and behavioral factors most salient to sleep disturbances in pediatric cancer.

Indexed as

Models, BiologicalChildChild, PreschoolFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansMalePrecursor Cell Lymphoblastic Leukemia-LymphomaSleep Wake Disorderscancerqualitative datasleep

Identifiers

PMID26994058
PMCPMC6281138
OpenAlexW2304259988

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.