Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26993622›Full record

SynthesisBMJ open2016

Association between subjective social status and cardiovascular disease and cardiovascular risk factors: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Karen L Tang, Ruksana Rashid, Jenny Godley, William A Ghali

Open access · goldAbstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in BMJ open, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 83 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
83citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
23.1field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

83 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 168 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Prevalence, Risk Factors, and Multimorbidity Patterns in Climacteric Women with Hypertension.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2025
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Dress is a Fundamental Component of Person Perception.Personality and social psychology review : an official journal of the Society for Personality and Social Psychology, Inc · 2023
    Review
  18. Article
  19. Subjective Social Status and Longitudinal Changes in Systemic Inflammation.Annals of behavioral medicine : a publication of the Society of Behavioral Medicine · 2023
    Article
  20. Article

23 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Karen L TangDepartment of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.
Ruksana RashidDepartment of Community Health Sciences, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.
Jenny GodleyDepartment of Sociology, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada O' Brien Institute for Public Health, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.
William A GhaliDepartment of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada Department of Community Health Sciences, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada O' Brien Institute for Public Health, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.
O'Brien Institute · AUUniversity of Calgary · CA

Funding

Canadian Institutes of Health Research
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo determine the association between subjective social status (SSS), or the individual's perception of his or her position in the social hierarchy, and the odds of coronary artery disease (CAD), hypertension, diabetes, obesity and dyslipidaemia. STUDY

designSystematic review and meta-analysis.

methodsWe searched PubMed, MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, PsycINFO, SocINDEX, Web of Science and reference lists of all included studies up to October 2014, with a verification search in July 2015. Inclusion criteria were original studies in adults that reported odds, risk or hazard ratios of at least one outcome of interest (CAD, hypertension, diabetes, obesity or dyslipidaemia), comparing 'lower' versus 'higher' SSS groups, where SSS is measured on a self-anchoring ladder. ORs were pooled using a random-effects model.

results10 studies were included in the systematic review; 9 of these were included in the meta-analysis. In analyses unadjusted for objective socioeconomic status (SES) measures such as income, education or occupation, the pooled OR comparing the bottom versus the top of the SSS ladder was 1.82 (95% CI 1.10 to 2.99) for CAD, 1.88 (95% CI 1.27 to 2.79) for hypertension, 1.90 (95% CI 1.25 to 2.87) for diabetes, 3.68 (95% CI 2.03 to 6.64) for dyslipidaemia and 1.57 (95% CI 0.95 to 2.59) for obesity. These associations were attenuated when adjusting for objective SES measures, with the only statistically significant association remaining for dyslipidaemia (OR 2.10, 95% CI 1.09 to 4.06), though all ORs remained greater than 1.

conclusionsLower SSS is associated with significantly increased odds of CAD, hypertension, diabetes and dyslipidaemia, with a trend towards increased odds of obesity. These trends are consistently present, though the effects attenuated when adjusting for SES, suggesting that perception of one's own status on a social hierarchy has health effects above and beyond one's actual income, occupation and education.

Indexed as

Social ClassAdultCoronary DiseaseDiabetes Mellitus, Type 2DyslipidemiasFemaleHealth Status IndicatorsHealth SurveysHumansHypertensionMaleObesityOdds RatioPolicy MakingPopulation SurveillanceRisk FactorsCARDIOLOGYEPIDEMIOLOGYINTERNAL MEDICINEPUBLIC HEALTHSOCIAL MEDICINE

Identifiers

PMID26993622
PMCPMC4800117
OpenAlexW2300810117

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.