Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26993599›Full record

ArticleOncotarget2016

Cell fate determination in cisplatin resistance and chemosensitization.

Khanh V Luong, Ling Wang, Brett J Roberts, James K Wahl, Aimin Peng

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Oncotarget, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. PARP1 Upregulation in Recurrent Oral Cancer and Treatment Resistance.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2021
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Khanh V LuongDepartment of Oral Biology, College of Dentistry, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Lincoln, NE 68583, USA.
Ling WangDepartment of Oral Biology, College of Dentistry, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Lincoln, NE 68583, USA.
Brett J RobertsDepartment of Oral Biology, College of Dentistry, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Lincoln, NE 68583, USA.
James K WahlDepartment of Oral Biology, College of Dentistry, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Lincoln, NE 68583, USA.
Aimin PengDepartment of Oral Biology, College of Dentistry, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Lincoln, NE 68583, USA.
University of Nebraska Medical Center · US

Funding

UNMC/EPPLEY CANCER CENTER SUPPORT GRANTP30CA036727 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF NEBRASKA MEDICAL CENTER · PI Apar Kishor Ganti · 1985 to 2026
$55.0M
Research Pilot Project ProgramP30GM106397 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF NEBRASKA MEDICAL CENTER · PI JOHNSON, KEITH R · 2013 to 2017
$4.9M
DNA Damage Checkpoint Recovery and CancerR01CA172574 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF NEBRASKA MEDICAL CENTER · PI PENG, AIMIN · 2013 to 2017
$1.6M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA036727NCI NIH HHS R01 CA172574NIGMS NIH HHS P30 GM106397
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Understanding the determination of cell fate choices after cancer treatment will shed new light on cancer resistance. In this study, we quantitatively analyzed the individual cell fate choice in resistant UM-SCC-38 head and neck cancer cells exposed to cisplatin. Our study revealed a highly heterogeneous pattern of cell fate choices in UM-SCC-38 cells, in comparison to that of the control, non-tumorigenic keratinocyte HaCaT cells. In both UM-SCC-38 and HaCaT cell lines, the majority of cell death occurred during the immediate interphase without mitotic entry, whereas significant portions of UM-SCC-38 cells survived the treatment via either checkpoint arrest or checkpoint slippage. Interestingly, checkpoint slippage occurred predominantly in cells treated in late S and G2 phases, and cells in M-phase were hypersensitive to cisplatin. Moreover, although the cisplatin-resistant progression of mitosis exhibited no delay in general, prolonged mitosis was correlated with the induction of cell death in mitosis. The finding thus suggested a combinatorial treatment using cisplatin and an agent that blocks mitotic exit. Consistently, we showed a strong synergy between cisplatin and the proteasome inhibitor Mg132. Finally, targeting the DNA damage checkpoint using inhibitors of ATR, but not ATM, effectively sensitized UM-SCC-38 to cisplatin treatment. Surprisingly, checkpoint targeting eliminated both checkpoint arrest and checkpoint slippage, and augmented the induction of cell death in interphase without mitotic entry. Taken together, our study, by profiling cell fate determination after cisplatin treatment, reveals new insights into chemoresistance and suggests combinatorial strategies that potentially overcome cancer resistance.

Indexed as

Drug Resistance, NeoplasmAntineoplastic AgentsApoptosisCell Cycle CheckpointsCell ProliferationCisplatinDNA DamageHead and Neck NeoplasmsHumansMitosisTumor Cells, CulturedAntineoplastic AgentsCisplatincaffeinecell fatechemoresistancecisplatinMg132

Identifiers

PMID26993599
PMCPMC5029634
OpenAlexW2301121189

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.