Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26993598›Full record

ArticleOncotarget2016

Systematic large-scale meta-analysis identifies a panel of two mRNAs as blood biomarkers for colorectal cancer detection.

Maria Teresa Rodia, Giampaolo Ugolini, Gabriella Mattei, Isacco Montroni, Davide Zattoni, Federico Ghignone, Giacomo Veronese, Giorgia Marisi, Mattia Lauriola, Pierluigi Strippoli and 1 more

Registry-linked trialOpen access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Oncotarget, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04980443 (CELTiC Trial), which is not on this map. Cited by 30 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
30citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.3field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04980443 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2021, after this paper: background citation

CELTiC Trial: an International Multicentre Study Evaluating the CELTiC Panel for the Detection of Advanced Neoplasia in Fecal Immunochemical Test (FIT)-Positive Individuals

TypeinterventionalSponsorAcademisch Medisch Centrum - Universiteit van Amsterdam (AMC-UvA)Ran2021 to 2022Enrolled809ConditionsColorectal Cancer, Colorectal Neoplasms, Colorectal Carcinoma, Colorectal PolypArmsCELTiC test
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

30 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 40 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. The emerging roles of CEACAM6 in human cancer (Review).International journal of oncology · 2024
    Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Extracellular Matrix Biomarkers in Colorectal Cancer.International journal of molecular sciences · 2021
    Review
  10. CirculatingJournal of clinical medicine · 2021
    Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Colorectal cancer screening: Assessment ofJournal of advanced research · 2020
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. An enrichment model using regular health examination data for early detection of colorectal cancer.Chinese journal of cancer research = Chung-kuo yen cheng yen chiu · 2019
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Maria Teresa RodiaDepartment of Experimental, Diagnostic and Specialty Medicine (DIMES), Unit of Histology, Embryology and Applied Biology, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy.
Giampaolo UgoliniDepartment of Medical and Surgical Sciences (DIMEC), University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy.
Gabriella MatteiDepartment of Experimental, Diagnostic and Specialty Medicine (DIMES), Unit of Histology, Embryology and Applied Biology, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy.
Isacco MontroniDepartment of Medical and Surgical Sciences (DIMEC), University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy.
Davide ZattoniDepartment of Medical and Surgical Sciences (DIMEC), University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy.
Federico GhignoneDepartment of Medical and Surgical Sciences (DIMEC), University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy.
Giacomo VeroneseDepartment of Medical and Surgical Sciences (DIMEC), University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy.
Giorgia MarisiBiosciences Laboratory, Istituto Scientifico Romagnolo per lo Studio e la Cura dei Tumori (IRST) IRCSS, Meldola, Italy.
Mattia LauriolaDepartment of Experimental, Diagnostic and Specialty Medicine (DIMES), Unit of Histology, Embryology and Applied Biology, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy.
Pierluigi StrippoliDepartment of Experimental, Diagnostic and Specialty Medicine (DIMES), Unit of Histology, Embryology and Applied Biology, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy.
Rossella SolmiDepartment of Experimental, Diagnostic and Specialty Medicine (DIMES), Unit of Histology, Embryology and Applied Biology, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy.
University of Bologna · ITIstituto Scientifico Romagnolo per lo Studio e la Cura dei Tumori · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Colorectal cancer (CRC) is the third most common cancer in the world. A significant survival rate is achieved if it is detected at an early stage. A whole blood screening test, without any attempt to isolate blood fractions, could be an important tool to improve early detection of colorectal cancer. We searched for candidate markers with a novel approach based on the Transcriptome Mapper (TRAM), aimed at identifying specific RNAs with the highest differential expression ratio between colorectal cancer tissue and normal blood samples. This tool permits a large-scale systematic meta-analysis of all available data obtained by microarray experiments. The targeting of RNA took into consideration that tumour phenotypic variation is associated with changes in the mRNA levels of genes regulating or affecting this variation.A real time quantitative reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (qRT- PCR) was applied to the validation of candidate markers in the blood of 67 patients and 67 healthy controls. The expression of genes: TSPAN8, LGALS4, COL1A2 and CEACAM6 resulted as being statistically different.In particular ROC curves attested for TSPAN8 an AUC of 0.751 with a sensitivity of 83.6% and a specificity of 58.2% at a cut off of 10.85, while the panel of the two best genes showed an AUC of 0.861 and a sensitivity of 92.5% with a specificity of 67.2%.Our preliminary study on a total of 134 subjects showed promising results for a blood screening test to be validated in a larger cohort with the staging stratification and in patients with other gastrointestinal diseases.

Indexed as

Meta-Analysis as TopicAgedAntigens, CDBiomarkers, TumorCell Adhesion MoleculesCollagen Type IColorectal NeoplasmsFemaleGalectin 4Gene Expression ProfilingGene Expression Regulation, NeoplasticGPI-Linked ProteinsHumansMaleMiddle AgedReverse Transcriptase Polymerase Chain ReactionAntigens, CDBiomarkers, TumorCEACAM6 protein, humanCell Adhesion MoleculesCOL1A2 protein, humanCollagen Type IGalectin 4GPI-Linked ProteinsLGALS4 protein, humanRNA, MessengerTetraspaninsTSPAN8 protein, humanCRC: colorectal cancerCTC: circulating tumour cellsTRAM: Transcriptome Mapper

Identifiers

PMID26993598
PMCPMC5058681
OpenAlexW2302353269

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.