Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26993315›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging2016

Detection of recurrent prostate cancer lesions before salvage lymphadenectomy is more accurate with (68)Ga-PSMA-HBED-CC than with (18)F-Fluoroethylcholine PET/CT.

David Pfister, Daniel Porres, Axel Heidenreich, Isabel Heidegger, Ruth Knuechel, Florian Steib, Florian F Behrendt, Frederik A Verburg

Registry-linked trialAbstract readComparative Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05936658 (A Multi-center, Open-label, Single Arm Phase III Clinical Trial for the Diagnostic Efficacy Assessment and Safety Evaluation by [18F]Florastamin PET/CT Imaging Examination in Patients With Suspected Recurrent or Metastatic Prostate Cancer), which is not on this map. Cited by 59 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
59citing papers in PubMed, 5 pooled it
23.8field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05936658 phase3active not recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2023, after this paper: background citation

A Multi-center, Open-label, Single Arm Phase III Clinical Trial for the Diagnostic Efficacy Assessment and Safety Evaluation by [18F]Florastamin PET/CT Imaging Examination in Patients With Suspected Recurrent or Metastatic Prostate Cancer

TypeinterventionalSponsorFutureChemRan2023 to 2025Enrolled138ConditionsHigh Risk Prostate CarcinomaArms[F-18]Florastamin
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

59 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 139 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Performance of [Prostate cancer and prostatic diseases · 2020
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Metaanalysis ofJournal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine · 2019
    Pooled it
  4. Role of salvage lymph node dissection in patients previously treated for prostate cancer: systematic review.International braz j urol : official journal of the Brazilian Society of Urology
    Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. [Molecular imaging and biology · 2025
    Trial
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Improved [Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery · 2023
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Head-to-Head Comparison ofJournal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine · 2021
    Article
  13. Novel PET imaging methods for prostate cancer.World journal of urology · 2021
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. [Recent progress of positron radionuclide labeled small molecule inhibitors of prostate specific membrane antigen for PET/CT imaging of prostate cancer].Sheng wu yi xue gong cheng xue za zhi = Journal of biomedical engineering = Shengwu yixue gongchengxue zazhi · 2020
    Review
  18. Comparison ofScientific reports · 2020
    Article
  19. Deep neural network for automatic characterization of lesions onEuropean journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2020
    Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

David PfisterDepartment of Urology, RWTH University Hospital Aachen, Aachen, Germany. david.pfister@uk-koeln.de.
Daniel PorresDepartment of Urology, RWTH University Hospital Aachen, Aachen, Germany.
Axel HeidenreichDepartment of Urology, RWTH University Hospital Aachen, Aachen, Germany.
Isabel HeideggerDepartment of Urology, RWTH University Hospital Aachen, Aachen, Germany.
Ruth KnuechelDepartment of Pathology, RWTH University Hospital Aachen, Aachen, Germany.
Florian SteibDepartment of Pathology, RWTH University Hospital Aachen, Aachen, Germany.
Florian F BehrendtDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, RWTH University Hospital Aachen, Aachen, Germany.
Frederik A VerburgDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, RWTH University Hospital Aachen, Aachen, Germany.
Universitätsklinikum Aachen · DERWTH Aachen University · DEUniversity Hospital Cologne · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aim[(68)Ga]PSMA-HBED-CC ((68)Ga-PSMA) is a novel and promising tracer for highly sensitive combined integrated positron emission tomography and X-ray computed tomography (PET/CT) diagnosis of recurrent prostate cancer (PCA). Our aim was to assess the sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive value (PPV/NPV), and accuracy per lesion, as well as the positive predictive value per patient of (68)Ga-PSMA PET/CT using post-lymphadenectomy histology as a standard, and to compare these values to those obtained in a patient collective scanned using (18)F-Fluoroethylcholine ((18)FEC) PET/CT.

methodsThirty eight patients had (18)FEC and 28 patients had (68)Ga-PSMA. We performed a pelvic and/or retroperitoneal lymphadenectomy, if necessary supplemented by resection of locally recurrent lesions in accordance with imaging results.

resultsIn 30/38 (18)FEC and 23/28 (68)Ga-PSMA patients ≥1 focus of PCA was identified in postsurgical histology, leading to a per-patient PPV of 78.9 % for (18)FEC and 82.1 % for (68)Ga-PSMA. In (18)FEC and (68)Ga-PSMA patients, a total of 378 and 308 lymph nodes and local lesions were removed, respectively. For (18)FEC and (68)for Ga-PSMA, the respective sensitivity (95 % confidence interval) was 71.2 % (64.5-79.6 %) and 86.9 % (75.8-94.2 %), specificity was 86.9 % (82.3-90.6 % ) and 93.1 % (89.2-95.9 %), PPV was 67.3 % (57.7-75.9 %) and 75.7 % (64.0-98.5 %), NPV was 88.8 % (84.4-92.3 %) and 96.6 % (93.5-98.5 %), and accuracy was 82.5 % (78.3-86.8 %) and 91.9 % (88.7 %-95.1 %).

conclusionIn the present series Ga-PSMA PET/CT shows a better performance than FEC PET/CT with a significantly higher NPV and accuracy for the detection of locoregional recurrent and/or metastatic lesions prior to salvage lymphadenectomy.

Indexed as

Lymph Node ExcisionOligopeptidesSalvage TherapyAgedCholineEdetic AcidGallium IsotopesGallium RadioisotopesHumansMaleMiddle AgedPositron Emission Tomography Computed TomographyProstatic NeoplasmsRecurrenceRetrospective StudiesSensitivity and SpecificityCholineEdetic Acidfluoroethylcholinegallium 68 PSMA-11Gallium IsotopesGallium RadioisotopesOligopeptidesF-18-Fluoroethycholine PET/CTGa-68-PSMA PET/CTHistologyProstate cancerSalvage lymphadenectomy

Identifiers

PMID26993315
OpenAlexW2298184988

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.