Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26993261›Full record

Trial reportTrials2016

Early versus late initiation of renal replacement therapy in critically ill patients with acute kidney injury (The ELAIN-Trial): study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.

Alexander Zarbock, Joachim Gerß, Hugo Van Aken, Andreea Boanta, John A Kellum, Melanie Meersch

Erratum issuedAbstract readComparative StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Trials, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 8 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Timing of kidney replacement therapy initiation for acute kidney injury.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2022
    Pooled it
  2. Timing of renal replacement therapy initiation for acute kidney injury.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2018
    Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Comparison of Standard Conservative Treatment and Early Initiation of Renal Replacement Therapy in Pregnancy-related Acute Kidney Injury: A Single-center Prospective Study.Indian journal of critical care medicine : peer-reviewed, official publication of Indian Society of Critical Care Medicine · 2020
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Alexander ZarbockDepartment of Anesthesiology, Intensive Care and Pain Medicine, University of Münster, Albert-Schweitzer-Campus 1, Gebäude A1, 48149, Münster, Germany. zarbock@uni-muenster.de.
Joachim GerßInstitute of Biostatistics and Clinical Research, University of Münster, Münster, Germany.
Hugo Van AkenDepartment of Anesthesiology, Intensive Care and Pain Medicine, University of Münster, Albert-Schweitzer-Campus 1, Gebäude A1, 48149, Münster, Germany.
Andreea BoantaDepartment of Anesthesiology, Intensive Care and Pain Medicine, University of Münster, Albert-Schweitzer-Campus 1, Gebäude A1, 48149, Münster, Germany.
John A KellumDepartment of Critical Care Medicine, Clinical Research, Investigation, and System Modelling of Acute Illness (CRISMA) Center, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
Melanie MeerschDepartment of Anesthesiology, Intensive Care and Pain Medicine, University of Münster, Albert-Schweitzer-Campus 1, Gebäude A1, 48149, Münster, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAcute kidney injury remains a common complication in critically ill patients and despite multiple trials and observational studies, the optimal timing for initiation of renal replacement therapy is still unclear. The early versus late initiation of renal replacement therapy in critically ill patients with acute kidney injury (ELAIN) study is a randomized, single-center, prospective, two-arm, parallel group trial to reduce mortality in patients with severe acute kidney injury. We describe the study design and discuss aspects of the need for a trial in this patient cohort. METHODS/

designOur plan is to randomize critically ill patients with acute kidney injury to 'early' or 'late' initiation of renal replacement therapy according to stage 2 and 3 of the KDIGO classification using a specific trial protocol. We plan to guide data collection and analysis using pre-existing definitions and testing. The primary endpoint is overall survival in a 90-day follow-up period. Secondary endpoints include 28-day, 60-day, 90-day and 1-year all-cause mortality, recovery of renal function, ICU and hospital length-of-stay. The primary analysis will be an intention-to-treat analysis; secondary analyses include treated analyses. We will also specify rules for handling data and determining outcome. DISCUSSION: Several challenges for study design and execution can be seen in our trial, and it should generate results that will inform and influence the practice of renal replacement therapy in critically ill patients with acute kidney injury.

trial registrationGerman Clinical Trials Register: DRKS00004367 ( www.germanctr.de ); 28 May 2013.

Indexed as

Acute Kidney InjuryAdolescentAdultAgedAged, 80 and overClinical ProtocolsCritical IllnessFemaleGermanyHumansIntention to Treat AnalysisKidneyLength of StayMaleMiddle AgedRecovery of FunctionAcute kidney injuryClinical trialCritically ill patientsRenal replacement therapy

Identifiers

PMID26993261
PMCPMC4797166

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.