Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26993256›Full record

ArticleMolecular biology and evolution2016

The Complex Admixture History and Recent Southern Origins of Siberian Populations.

Irina Pugach, Rostislav Matveev, Viktor Spitsyn, Sergey Makarov, Innokentiy Novgorodov, Vladimir Osakovsky, Mark Stoneking, Brigitte Pakendorf

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Molecular biology and evolution, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 31 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
31citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

31 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Ancestral Origins and Admixture History of Kazakhs.Molecular biology and evolution · 2024
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Mitogenomics of modern Mongolic-speaking populations.Molecular genetics and genomics : MGG · 2022
    Article
  12. Modern Siberian dog ancestry was shaped by several thousand years of Eurasian-wide trade and human dispersal.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2021
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2021
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Human population dynamics andScience advances · 2021
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Irina PugachDepartment of Evolutionary Genetics, Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology, Leipzig, Germany irina_pugach@eva.mpg.de brigitte.pakendorf@cnrs.fr.
Rostislav MatveevMax Planck Institute for Mathematics in the Sciences, Leipzig, Germany.
Viktor SpitsynResearch Centre for Medical Genetics, Federal State Budgetary Institution, Moscow, Russian Federation.
Sergey MakarovResearch Centre for Medical Genetics, Federal State Budgetary Institution, Moscow, Russian Federation.
Innokentiy NovgorodovInstitute of Foreign Philology and Regional Studies, North-Eastern Federal University, Yakutsk, Russian Federation.
Vladimir OsakovskyInstitute of Health, North-Eastern Federal University, Yakutsk, Russian Federation.
Mark StonekingDepartment of Evolutionary Genetics, Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology, Leipzig, Germany.
Brigitte PakendorfLaboratoire Dynamique du Langage, UMR5596, CNRS and Université Lyon Lumière 2, Lyon, France irina_pugach@eva.mpg.de brigitte.pakendorf@cnrs.fr.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Although Siberia was inhabited by modern humans at an early stage, there is still debate over whether it remained habitable during the extreme cold of the Last Glacial Maximum or whether it was subsequently repopulated by peoples with recent shared ancestry. Previous studies of the genetic history of Siberian populations were hampered by the extensive admixture that appears to have taken place among these populations, because commonly used methods assume a tree-like population history and at most single admixture events. Here we analyze geogenetic maps and use other approaches to distinguish the effects of shared ancestry from prehistoric migrations and contact, and develop a new method based on the covariance of ancestry components, to investigate the potentially complex admixture history. We furthermore adapt a previously devised method of admixture dating for use with multiple events of gene flow, and apply these methods to whole-genome genotype data from over 500 individuals belonging to 20 different Siberian ethnolinguistic groups. The results of these analyses indicate that there have been multiple layers of admixture detectable in most of the Siberian populations, with considerable differences in the admixture histories of individual populations. Furthermore, most of the populations of Siberia included here, even those settled far to the north, appear to have a southern origin, with the northward expansions of different populations possibly being driven partly by the advent of pastoralism, especially reindeer domestication. These newly developed methods to analyze multiple admixture events should aid in the investigation of similarly complex population histories elsewhere.

Indexed as

Asian PeopleBiological EvolutionEvolution, MolecularGene FlowGenetics, PopulationGenetic VariationGenomicsHaplotypesHumansPhylogenyPhylogeographyPolymorphism, Single NucleotideSiberiaadmixture datingback migrationLGMmultiple admixture eventspopulation replacementwavelets

Identifiers

PMID26993256
PMCPMC4915357

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.