Childhood Vaccine Exemptions: A Broader Perspective Is Required.

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

1. Lessons from a decade of individual-based models for infectious disease transmission: a systematic review (2006-2015).BMC infectious diseases · 2017
   Pooled it
2. To EHB 1638 or Not to EHB 1638? For Immunization Policymakers, That Is the Question.American journal of public health · 2023
   Article
3. Vaccination Policies: Between Best and Basic Interests of the Child, between Precaution and Proportionality.Public health ethics · 2020
   Article
4. On religious and secular exemptions: A case study of childhood vaccination waivers.Ethnicities · 2017
   Article

Corrections and comments

• Comment on
  Childhood Vaccine Exemption Policy: The Case for a Less Restrictive Alternative.2016

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Funding

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as