ArticleEuropean journal of pediatrics2016
Smoking prevalence among pregnant women from 2007 to 2012 at a tertiary-care hospital.
Article in European journal of pediatrics, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 25 citations in OpenAlex.
- National, regional, and global prevalence of cigarette smoking among women/females in the general population: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Environmental health and preventive medicine · 2021Pooled it
- A single-center, prospective, observational study on maternal smoking during pregnancy in Greece: The HELENA study.Tobacco prevention & cessation · 2021Article
- Prevalence of tobacco use and associated risk factors among pregnant women in Maracha District, Uganda.Journal of public health and epidemiologyArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
unlabelledThe harmful effects of smoking during pregnancy are well known, but we lack prevalence data concerning this subject in Austria. The aim ofz the present study was to determine the prevalence and any changes in the prevalence of smoking during pregnancy in the last few years. The investigation was conducted at a perinatal center in Vienna, Austria. Further aims of the study were to evaluate maternal characteristics associated with smoking and demonstrate the harmful effects of smoking on neonatal outcome in this population. Once inquired, self-reported smoking during pregnancy, maternal age, and neonatal data from 2007 to 2012 were evaluated retrospectively. Of birth records, 11,142 were analyzed. From 2007 to 2012, the prevalence of smoking declined significantly from 19.1 to 15.6 %. The overall prevalence was 18.1 % and was highest (43.7 %) among young women (<20 years). The risk of small for gestational age (SGA) was significantly higher among newborns of smoking mothers.
conclusionThe prevalence of smoking among pregnant women has declined in Austria in the last few years but is still quite high. Prevention programs should focus on young women, who are at highest risk in this regard. WHAT IS KNOWN: • Smoking during pregnancy is known to exert harmful effects What is New: • Paucity of epidemiological data regarding this subject in Austria • Significant decline of self-reported smoking during pregnancy from 2007 to 2012 in Vienna.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.