Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26992385›Full record

ReviewHNO2016

Treatment in elderly patients with head and neck cancer : A challenging dilemma.

A Teymoortash, A Ferlito, G B Halmos

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in HNO, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Observational
  12. Unravelling the risk factors that underlie oral and oropharyngeal surgery in elderly.Acta otorhinolaryngologica Italica : organo ufficiale della Societa italiana di otorinolaringologia e chirurgia cervico-facciale · 2018
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

A TeymoortashDepartment of Otolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, Philipp University of Marburg, Baldingerstr., 35043, Marburg, Germany. teymoort@med.uni-marburg.de.
A FerlitoCoordinator of the International Head and Neck Scientific Group, Padua, Italy.
G B HalmosDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, University of Groningen University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Despite the increasing number of elderly patients requiring treatment for head and neck cancer, there is insufficient available evidence about the oncological results of treatment and its tolerability in such patients. Owing to comorbidities, elderly patients often need complex evaluation and pretreatment management, which often results in their exclusion from clinical trials. The question of which patients constitute the highest-risk groups regarding treatment-related morbidity and mortality, and who can tolerate and benefit from aggressive treatment, has not been adequately studied. Biologic rather than chronologic age should be a more important factor in treatment protocols. Age-specific prospective clinical studies are needed on the treatment of head and neck cancer in elderly patients.

Indexed as

AgedAged, 80 and overChemoradiotherapyEvidence-Based MedicineFemaleGeriatric AssessmentHead and Neck NeoplasmsHealth Services for the AgedHumansMaleMiddle AgedOtorhinolaryngologic Surgical ProceduresPostoperative ComplicationsRisk AssessmentSurvival RateTreatment OutcomeComorbidityElderlyHead and neck cancerSurvivalTreatment

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.