Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26992383›Full record

ReviewHNO2016

[Is (chemo)radiotherapy really the future standard in the treatment of oropharyngeal carcinoma?].

R Knecht, L Bussmann, N Möckelmann, B B Lörincz

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in HNO, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 31% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Guideline
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

R KnechtKlinik und Poliklinik für Hals-, Nasen- und Ohrenheilkunde, Kopf-Hals-Chirurgie und Onkologie; Kopf-Hals-Tumorzentrum des Universitären Cancer Center Hamburg (UCCH), Universitätsklinikum Hamburg-Eppendorf, Martinistrasse 52, 20246, Hamburg, Deutschland. r.knecht@uke.de.
L BussmannKlinik und Poliklinik für Hals-, Nasen- und Ohrenheilkunde, Kopf-Hals-Chirurgie und Onkologie; Kopf-Hals-Tumorzentrum des Universitären Cancer Center Hamburg (UCCH), Universitätsklinikum Hamburg-Eppendorf, Martinistrasse 52, 20246, Hamburg, Deutschland.
N MöckelmannKlinik und Poliklinik für Hals-, Nasen- und Ohrenheilkunde, Kopf-Hals-Chirurgie und Onkologie; Kopf-Hals-Tumorzentrum des Universitären Cancer Center Hamburg (UCCH), Universitätsklinikum Hamburg-Eppendorf, Martinistrasse 52, 20246, Hamburg, Deutschland.
B B LörinczKlinik und Poliklinik für Hals-, Nasen- und Ohrenheilkunde, Kopf-Hals-Chirurgie und Onkologie; Kopf-Hals-Tumorzentrum des Universitären Cancer Center Hamburg (UCCH), Universitätsklinikum Hamburg-Eppendorf, Martinistrasse 52, 20246, Hamburg, Deutschland.
Klinik und Poliklinik für Hals-, Nasen-, Ohrenheilkunde · DEUniversität Hamburg · DEUniversity Cancer Center Hamburg · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Treatment of patients with oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma (OPSCC) requires interdisciplinary collaboration. Besides oncologic control, organ and function preservation are important priorities. One treatment option is primary concomitant chemoradiotherapy (CRT), particularly for locally advanced head and neck cancer. Another option is sequential CRT, where induction chemotherapy may be followed either by radiation alone or by CRT. An important aspect of these modalities is the development of functional sequelae with regards to swallowing as a direct consequence of radiogenic fibrosis, as well as tissue ctoxicity associated with cisplatin-based chemotherapy. Conventional open surgical approaches are being increasingly replaced by transoral surgical modalities with less treatment-related morbidity. As a further, equally important goal of appropriately indicated surgery, adjuvant (C)RT may be omitted or the dose significantly reduced. The advantages of primary surgery over primary CRT may be less obvious in cases still requiring adjuvant treatment, although not necessarily completely eliminated. For patients with human papillomavirus (HPV)-driven OPSCC, it is important to note that primary surgery may provide comparable or even increased survival benefit. To date, there is no evidence for a clear advantage of primary CRT over primary surgery in this group. In these cases, a de-escalated treatment package may be the preferred option. Here, the application of radioimmunotherapy as well as a reduced radiation dose may minimize long-term treatment-related morbidities.

Indexed as

ForecastingChemoradiotherapyEvidence-Based MedicineGermanyHumansMedical OncologyNeoplasms, Squamous CellOropharyngeal NeoplasmsOtolaryngologyTreatment OutcomeChemoradiotherapyComparative studiesHead and neck cancerHuman papilloma virusSurgery

Identifiers

PMID26992383
OpenAlexW2311066131

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.