ArticleBritish journal of clinical pharmacology2016
Characteristics and follow-up of postmarketing studies of conditionally authorized medicines in the EU.
Article in British journal of clinical pharmacology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
24 citing papers in PubMed.
- Accelerating the approval of mpox vaccines based on lessons learnt from COVID-19 vaccines through the lens of regulatory science.BMJ global health · 2025Review
- Duration of Time Intervals for Risk Minimization Measure Effectiveness Studies.Clinical pharmacology and therapeutics · 2025Article
- Uncertainties about the benefit-risk balance of oncology medicines assessed by the European Medicines Agency.ESMO open · 2024Article
- Article
- Duration of Effectiveness Evaluation of Additional Risk Minimisation Measures for Centrally Authorised Medicinal Products in the EU Between 2012 and 2021.Drug safety · 2023Article
- Article
- Observational
- Post-Marketing Requirements for Cancer Drugs Approved by the European Medicines Agency, 2004-2014.Clinical pharmacology and therapeutics · 2022Article
- The Role of Regulator-Imposed Post-Approval Studies in Health Technology Assessments for Conditionally Approved Drugs.International journal of health policy and management · 2022Article
- Article
- Use of Real-World Data and Evidence in Drug Development of Medicinal Products Centrally Authorized in Europe in 2018-2019.Clinical pharmacology and therapeutics · 2022Article
- Approval of Cancer Drugs With Uncertain Therapeutic Value: A Comparison of Regulatory Decisions in Europe and the United States.The Milbank quarterly · 2020Article
- Getting the Right Evidence After Drug Approval.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2020Article
- The use of validated and nonvalidated surrogate endpoints in two European Medicines Agency expedited approval pathways: A cross-sectional study of products authorised 2011-2018.PLoS medicine · 2019Article
- Weighing of Evidence by Health Technology Assessment Bodies: Retrospective Study of Reimbursement Recommendations for Conditionally Approved Drugs.Clinical pharmacology and therapeutics · 2019Article
- Oncologic orphan drugs approved in the EU - do clinical trial data correspond with real-world effectiveness?Orphanet journal of rare diseases · 2018Article
- Article
- Delays in completion and results reporting of clinical trials under the Paediatric Regulation in the European Union: A cohort study.PLoS medicine · 2018Article
- Postmarketing studies for novel drugs approved by both the FDA and EMA between 2005 and 2010: a cross-sectional study.BMJ open · 2017Article
- Lessons learned on the design and the conduct of Post-Authorization Safety Studies: review of 3 years of PRAC oversight.British journal of clinical pharmacology · 2017Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
aimThe aim of the present study was to provide an insight into the characteristics and follow-up of postmarketing studies of medicines that were conditionally authorized in the European Union (EU).
methodsWe compiled a list of all postmarketing studies attached as specific obligations to the licence of medicines that were granted conditional marketing authorization from January 2006 to April 2014. Studies were characterized based on their objective, design, status upon marketing authorization (MA) and due data set by authorities. They were linked to online study registrations (Clinicaltrials.gov, ENCePP) to determine completion date. We described and associated characteristics of studies and medicines, and determined whether studies were completed on time.
resultsA total of 59 postmarketing studies were requested for 21 conditionally authorized medicines. Most studies had an interventional study design (73%), were ongoing upon MA (61%) and aimed to provide additional data on efficacy (45%). Interventional studies were more often ongoing and providing efficacy data, while observational and other studies were more often new and providing safety data. Frequent grounds for requesting postmarketing studies were 'long-term follow-up' and 'increase data on subpopulations'. Of the 34 studies eligible for follow-up analysis, 26 (76%) were completed and 17 (50%) completed on time. Actual completion time took a median (interquartile range) of 274 (-121 to 556) days longer than expected.
conclusionsOur results indicated that most postmarketing studies attached to a conditional marketing authorization were eventually completed but that half were completed with a substantial delay. The observations suggest caution when broadening the use of postmarketing studies for resolving uncertainties about benefits and risks after MA.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.