Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26991853›Full record

ArticleDNA repair2016

DNA damage response (DDR) pathway engagement in cisplatin radiosensitization of non-small cell lung cancer.

Catherine R Sears, Sean A Cooney, Helen Chin-Sinex, Marc S Mendonca, John J Turchi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in DNA repair, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 34 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
34citing papers in PubMed
4.4field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

34 citing papers in PubMed, 60 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Catherine R SearsDepartments of Medicine, Indiana University School of Medicine, United States. Electronic address: crufatto@iu.edu.
Sean A CooneySchool of Health and Rehabilitation Sciences, Indiana University-Purdue University, Indianapolis, Indiana, United States.
Helen Chin-SinexRadiation Oncology, Indiana University School of Medicine, United States.
Marc S MendoncaRadiation Oncology, Indiana University School of Medicine, United States; Medical and Molecular Genetics, Indiana University School of Medicine, United States.
John J TurchiDepartments of Medicine, Indiana University School of Medicine, United States; Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Indiana University School of Medicine, United States.
Indiana University · USIndiana University School of MedicineIndiana University – Purdue University Indianapolis · US

Funding

Targeting nucleotide excision repair in combination cancer therapyR01CA180710 · NCI · INDIANA UNIVERSITY INDIANAPOLIS · PI TURCHI, JOHN J. · 2013 to 2017
$1.6M
NCI NIH HHS R01 CA180710NCI NIH HHS R01R01CA180710
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Non-small cell lung cancers (NSCLC) are commonly treated with a platinum-based chemotherapy such as cisplatin (CDDP) in combination with ionizing radiation (IR). Although clinical trials have demonstrated that the combination of CDDP and IR appear to be synergistic in terms of therapeutic efficacy, the mechanism of synergism remains largely uncharacterized. We investigated the role of the DNA damage response (DDR) in CDDP radiosensitization using two NSCLC cell lines. Using clonogenic survival assays, we determined that the cooperative cytotoxicity of CDDP and IR treatment is sequence dependent, requiring administration of CDDP prior to IR (CDDP-IR). We identified and interrogated the unique time and agent-dependent activation of the DDR in NSCLC cells treated with cisplatin-IR combination therapy. Compared to treatment with CDDP or IR alone, CDDP-IR combination treatment led to persistence of γH2Ax foci, a marker of DNA double-strand breaks (DSB), for up to 24h after treatment. Interestingly, pharmacologic inhibition of DDR sensor kinases revealed the persistence of γ-H2Ax foci in CDDP-IR treated cells is independent of kinase activation. Taken together, our data suggest that delayed repair of DSBs in NSCLC cells treated with CDDP-IR contributes to CDDP radiosensitization and that alterations of the DDR pathways by inhibition of specific DDR kinases can augment CDDP-IR cytotoxicity by a complementary mechanism.

Indexed as

Recombinational DNA RepairAntineoplastic AgentsCarcinoma, Non-Small-Cell LungCell Line, TumorCisplatinDNA Breaks, Double-StrandedDNA Repair EnzymesG2 Phase Cell Cycle CheckpointsHumansRadiation-Sensitizing AgentsRadiation ToleranceX-RaysAntineoplastic AgentsCisplatinDNA Repair EnzymesRadiation-Sensitizing AgentsATMATRCisplatinDamage responseLung cancerRadiation

Identifiers

PMID26991853
PMCPMC4852375
OpenAlexW2291134671

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.