Trial reportClinical cardiology2016
Vascular Effects of Eplerenone in Coronary Artery Disease With Preserved Ejection Fraction: A Double-Blind, Randomized, Placebo-Controlled Trial.
Trial report in Clinical cardiology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 8 citations in OpenAlex.
- Pooled it
- Design of the Magnetic Resonance Imaging Evaluation of Mineralocorticoid Receptor Antagonism in Diabetic Atherosclerosis (MAGMA) Trial.Clinical cardiology · 2017Trial
- The endothelial mineralocorticoid receptor: mediator of the switch from vascular health to disease.Current opinion in nephrology and hypertension · 2017Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundMineralocorticoid receptor antagonists (MRAs) reduce morbidity and mortality in heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF). Their role in patients without heart failure, particularly in patients with coronary artery disease (CAD) and preserved EF, is still a matter of debate. HYPOTHESIS: The MRA eplerenone on top of standard medical therapy improves endothelial dysfunction and other markers of vascular health in CAD patients with preserved EF.
methodsIn this double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled study, 42 patients (mean age: 63.5 ± 9.1 years; 37 males) were randomized to 4-week treatment with eplerenone 25 mg daily or placebo. The primary endpoint was difference in endothelial function as assessed by flow-mediated dilatation (FMD) of the brachial artery. Secondary endpoints included 24-hour blood pressure (BP), endothelial progenitor cells, and platelet adhesion.
resultsNo difference in the primary endpoint FMD was noted after 4 weeks of treatment with eplerenone compared with placebo (FMD: 4.7% ± 2.0% and 4.9% ± 2.1%, respectively; P = 0.77). There were no significant differences between eplerenone and placebo in 24-hour BP (mean systolic BP: 126.9 ± 17.3 and 123.3 ± 9.7 mm Hg, P = 0.41; diastolic BP: 73.3 ± 12.9 and 72.0 ± 7.5 mm Hg, respectively, P = 0.69), number of endothelial progenitor cells, and platelet adhesion.
conclusionsAdding low-dose eplerenone to standard medical therapy did not improve important markers of vascular health in patients with CAD and preserved EF. Our results may help understand conflicting evidence from larger clinical trials on MRAs in patients with preserved EF.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.