ArticleJournal of biomedical materials research. Part A2016
Indirect three-dimensional printing: A method for fabricating polyurethane-urea based cardiac scaffolds.
Article in Journal of biomedical materials research. Part A, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed.
- Indirect 3D printing in tissue engineering: expanding materials used for improved scaffold functionality.Biomedical engineering online · 2025Review
- Polyurethane-based three-dimensional printing for biological mesh carriers.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Towards the development of a shape memory polymer for individualized endovascular therapy of intracranial aneurysms using a 3D-printing/leaching method.Advanced engineering materials · 2023Article
- Biodegradable Inks in Indirect Three-Dimensional Bioprinting for Tissue Vascularization.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2022Review
- Biobased polyurethanes for biomedical applications.Bioactive materials · 2021Review
- Article
- Current Trends in Biomaterial Utilization for Cardiopulmonary System Regeneration.Stem cells international · 2018Review
- Development and Characterization of a Parallelizable Perfusion Bioreactor for 3D Cell Culture.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2017Article
- Indirect three-dimensional printing: A method for fabricating polyurethane-urea based cardiac scaffolds.Journal of biomedical materials research. Part A · 2016Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Biomaterial scaffolds are a key part of cardiac tissue engineering therapies. The group has recently synthesized a novel polycaprolactone based polyurethane-urea copolymer that showed improved mechanical properties compared with its previously published counterparts. The aim of this study was to explore whether indirect three-dimensional (3D) printing could provide a means to fabricate this novel, biodegradable polymer into a scaffold suitable for cardiac tissue engineering. Indirect 3D printing was carried out through printing water dissolvable poly(vinyl alcohol) porogens in three different sizes based on a wood-stack model, into which a polyurethane-urea solution was pressure injected. The porogens were removed, leading to soft polyurethane-urea scaffolds with regular tubular pores. The scaffolds were characterized for their compressive and tensile mechanical behavior; and their degradation was monitored for 12 months under simulated physiological conditions. Their compatibility with cardiac myocytes and performance in novel cardiac engineering-related techniques, such as aggregate seeding and bi-directional perfusion, was also assessed. The scaffolds were found to have mechanical properties similar to cardiac tissue, and good biocompatibility with cardiac myocytes. Furthermore, the incorporated cells preserved their phenotype with no signs of de-differentiation. The constructs worked well in perfusion experiments, showing enhanced seeding efficiency. © 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Biomed Mater Res Part A: 104A: 1912-1921, 2016.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.