Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26991636›Full record

ArticleJournal of biomedical materials research. Part A2016

Indirect three-dimensional printing: A method for fabricating polyurethane-urea based cardiac scaffolds.

R Hernández-Córdova, D A Mathew, R Balint, H J Carrillo-Escalante, J M Cervantes-Uc, L A Hidalgo-Bastida, F Hernández-Sánchez

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of biomedical materials research. Part A, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

R Hernández-CórdovaCentro de Investigación Científica de Yucatán, A.C., Mérida, Yucatán, México.
D A MathewSchool of Healthcare Sciences, Manchester Metropolitan University, Manchester, United Kingdom.
R BalintSchool of Materials, University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom.
H J Carrillo-EscalanteCentro de Investigación Científica de Yucatán, A.C., Mérida, Yucatán, México.
J M Cervantes-UcCentro de Investigación Científica de Yucatán, A.C., Mérida, Yucatán, México.
L A Hidalgo-BastidaSchool of Healthcare Sciences, Manchester Metropolitan University, Manchester, United Kingdom.
F Hernández-SánchezCentro de Investigación Científica de Yucatán, A.C., Mérida, Yucatán, México.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Biomaterial scaffolds are a key part of cardiac tissue engineering therapies. The group has recently synthesized a novel polycaprolactone based polyurethane-urea copolymer that showed improved mechanical properties compared with its previously published counterparts. The aim of this study was to explore whether indirect three-dimensional (3D) printing could provide a means to fabricate this novel, biodegradable polymer into a scaffold suitable for cardiac tissue engineering. Indirect 3D printing was carried out through printing water dissolvable poly(vinyl alcohol) porogens in three different sizes based on a wood-stack model, into which a polyurethane-urea solution was pressure injected. The porogens were removed, leading to soft polyurethane-urea scaffolds with regular tubular pores. The scaffolds were characterized for their compressive and tensile mechanical behavior; and their degradation was monitored for 12 months under simulated physiological conditions. Their compatibility with cardiac myocytes and performance in novel cardiac engineering-related techniques, such as aggregate seeding and bi-directional perfusion, was also assessed. The scaffolds were found to have mechanical properties similar to cardiac tissue, and good biocompatibility with cardiac myocytes. Furthermore, the incorporated cells preserved their phenotype with no signs of de-differentiation. The constructs worked well in perfusion experiments, showing enhanced seeding efficiency. © 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Biomed Mater Res Part A: 104A: 1912-1921, 2016.

Indexed as

Printing, Three-DimensionalCell AdhesionCell AggregationCell SurvivalCompressive StrengthDNAHeartHumansMaterials TestingMicroscopy, ConfocalMyocytes, CardiacPerfusionPolyurethanesPolyvinyl AlcoholPorositySpectroscopy, Fourier Transform InfraredDNApolyetherurethane ureaPolyurethanesPolyvinyl Alcoholcardiac tissue engineeringindirect 3D printingpolyurethane-urearapid prototypingscaffold fabrication

Identifiers

PMID26991636
PMCPMC5338726

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.