ArticleAnesthesia and analgesia2016
Distinct Hypnotic Recoveries After Infusions of Methoxycarbonyl Etomidate and Cyclopropyl Methoxycarbonyl Metomidate: The Role of the Metabolite.
Article in Anesthesia and analgesia, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.
- Recent progress in the development of etomidate analogues.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2025Review
- Review
- Structural Modification in Anesthetic Drug Development for Prodrugs and Soft Drugs.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2022Review
- Recent advances in intravenous anesthesia and anesthetics.F1000Research · 2018Review
- The Role of GABA Receptor Agonists in Anesthesia and Sedation.CNS drugs · 2017Review
- Sedative-hypnotic Binding to 11β-hydroxylase.Anesthesiology · 2016Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundMethoxycarbonyl etomidate (MOC-etomidate) and cyclopropyl methoxycarbonyl metomidate (CPMM) are rapidly metabolized "soft" etomidate analogs. CPMM's duration of hypnotic effect is context insensitive, whereas MOC-etomidate's is not. In this study, we tested the hypothesis that CPMM's effect is context insensitive because, unlike MOC-etomidate, its metabolite fails to reach physiologically important concentrations in vivo even with prolonged continuous infusion.
methodsWe compared the potencies with which MOC-etomidate and CPMM activate α1(L264T)β3γ2 γ-aminobutyric acid type A receptors and induce loss-of-righting reflexes (i.e., produce hypnosis) in tadpoles with those of their metabolites (MOC-etomidate's carboxylic acid metabolite [MOC-ECA] and CPMM's carboxylic acid metabolite [CPMM-CA], respectively). We measured metabolite concentrations in the blood and cerebrospinal fluid of Sprague-Dawley rats on CPMM infusion and compared them with those achieved with MOC-etomidate infusion. We measured the rates with which brain tissue from Sprague-Dawley rats metabolize MOC-etomidate and CPMM.
resultsBoth analogs and their metabolites enhanced γ-aminobutyric acid type A receptor function and induced loss-of-righting reflexes in a concentration-dependent manner. However, in these 2 assays, CPMM-CA's potency relative to its parent hypnotic was approximately 1:4900 and 1:1900, respectively, whereas MOC-ECA's was only approximately 1:415 and 1:390, respectively. With 2-hour CPMM infusions, CPMM-CA reached respective concentrations in the blood and cerebrospinal fluid that were 2 and >3 orders of magnitude lower than that which produced hypnosis. CPMM was metabolized by the brain tissue at a rate that is approximately 1/15th that of MOC-etomidate.
conclusionsHypnotic recovery after CPMM administration is context insensitive because its metabolite does not accumulate to hypnotic levels in the central nervous system. This reflects the very large potency ratio between CPMM and CPMM-CA and the resistance of CPMM to metabolism by esterases present in the brain.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.