Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26991498›Full record

ArticlePloS one2016

Discovering General Multidimensional Associations.

Ben Murrell, Daniel Murrell, Hugh Murrell

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Ben MurrellDepartment of Medicine, University of California San Diego, San Diego, United States of America.
Daniel MurrellCentre for Molecular Informatics, Department of Chemistry, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom.
Hugh MurrellComputer Science, University of KwaZulu-Natal, Pietermaritzburg, South Africa.

Funding

Viral sequence and dynamic determinants of antibody breadthK99AI120851 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO · PI MURRELL, BENJAMIN SYLVESTER · 2015 to 2015
$124k
NIAID NIH HHS K99 AI120851NIAID NIH HHS K99AI120851
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

When two variables are related by a known function, the coefficient of determination (denoted R2) measures the proportion of the total variance in the observations explained by that function. For linear relationships, this is equal to the square of the correlation coefficient, ρ. When the parametric form of the relationship is unknown, however, it is unclear how to estimate the proportion of explained variance equitably--assigning similar values to equally noisy relationships. Here we demonstrate how to directly estimate a generalised R2 when the form of the relationship is unknown, and we consider the performance of the Maximal Information Coefficient (MIC)--a recently proposed information theoretic measure of dependence. We show that our approach behaves equitably, has more power than MIC to detect association between variables, and converges faster with increasing sample size. Most importantly, our approach generalises to higher dimensions, estimating the strength of multivariate relationships (Y against A, B, …) as well as measuring association while controlling for covariates (Y against X controlling for C). An R package named matie ("Measuring Association and Testing Independence Efficiently") is available (http://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/matie/).

Indexed as

Linear ModelsMultivariate Analysis

Identifiers

PMID26991498
PMCPMC4798755

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.